Jump to content

Talk:Two-empire system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.144.81.110 (talk) at 07:22, 29 April 2009 (→‎Bipolar). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiology Unassessed
WikiProject iconTwo-empire system is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTree of Life Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Question

What view has vanished in the face of genetic analyses? The two-kingdom or three-kingdom one?

Bipolar

This is linked from Domain (biology), should we tag it? Because redirection to Bipolar doesn't work in this case. --Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 19:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Two-Empire System is almost exclusively used by biologists. Vvvvvvvvvvv 23:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

older two empire system

From the Domain talk page... it says that an older version of Empire in classification was...

  • Empire Inorganista ( IOW: Mineralia, or dead stuff)
  • Empire Organista ( IOW: Biota, or living stuff)

This would seem to be a much older usage of Empire, predating the 3-kingdom system, (animal, vegetable, mineral) ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.84.42 (talk) 03:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]