Jump to content

Talk:X-Men (film series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 65.33.138.221 (talk) at 04:15, 7 May 2009 (→‎X-Men Origins: Deadpool confirmed.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleX-Men (film series) has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starX-Men (film series) is the main article in the X-Men films series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 11, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
January 2, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconFilm: American GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Spin-off

Should we mention the Magneto and Wolverine spin-offs in more detail here? —Erik (talkcontrib) - 13:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beast before X3

Wasn't there a cameo of the Dr. McCoy on TV (not Kelsey Grammar, obviously) in either the first or second film? Should that be included? As long as we have the Kitty Pryde cameos mentioned... —Erik (talkcontrib) - 14:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, Steven Basic played the part. Alientraveller 14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Influences

In regard to the revert about the film's influences, I'm not sure why Variety should be questioned when it says, "Using several resources that include the Marvel Comics lore, along with the more recent Weapon X graphic novels by Frank Miller, Wolverine mixes action with an origin story about how Logan emerged from a barbaric experiment as an indestructible mutant with retractable razor-sharp claws." Is there something that overrides this? Scripts can change, you know. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 15:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. Frank Miller's four part Wolverine story with Chris Claremont wasn't about Weapon X. Alientraveller 15:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Wolverine is also known as Weapon X, so it's probably not explicitly about Wolverine's involvement with the program. I think that the recent influence should be mentioned, though, but re-worded to be vaguer and just point toward Frank Miller's work. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 16:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Variety may have confused Miller with Frank Tieri, who wrote the most recent Weapon X story, and Jackman said the film wasn't going to revolve around the Samurai backstory.[1] So I think we should leave it there. Alientraveller 16:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, we'll see what new information surfaces. The headline and discussion are here to revisit if there's any more clarification down the road. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 16:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard Entertainment has some answers. "I’ve been reading Wolverine comics for 23 years," admitted the writer. And while he couldn’t discuss specific elements of his script, Benioff did hint at his favorite Wolvie stories. “I went back and reread the Chris Claremont and Frank Miller miniseries, and the Barry Windsor-Smith Weapon X." There's more information about the film at the link. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 18:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cite is now there. Alientraveller 18:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

This article could do with a few more images, but other than that it seems to me to meet the good article criteria. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 23:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, images would be tough for a film series article... a lot of the information is broad. Maybe we could make a line graph of the first 10 weeks of the box office performance of the X-Men films. :) —Erik (talkcontrib) - 23:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cast members interested in returning

I'll incorporate these once I have time. Alientraveller 21:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've had problems installing Flash (it works on some sites), so could someone watch this Ellen Page interview? I'd sent in a question asking if she'd reprise the role of Kitty. [6] Alientraveller (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Kitty, it was mainly all to do with Juno. Sorry.  Paul  730 17:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Alientraveller (talk) 17:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cudmore in X1?

I know Colossus has a cameo in X1, he can be seen sketching in the court yard of the X-Mansion. However, are we sure that it's Daniel Cudmore who plays him? I can't remember even seeing his face. IMDb doesn't list anyone as playing Colossus, so are we sure he was even credited? Paul730 22:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

young wolverine

An actor has already been chosen to play young Logan. http://www.superherohype.com/news.php?id=6445 Franshu 21:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverine

Couldn't that section be remade into another article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.125.46 (talkcontribs)

Hi; as per the notability guidelines for films, it shouldn't have its own article until such time as filming begins. Due to the unpredictable nature of the film business, a project may be delayed or end up canceled altogether, even a high-profile project such as this one. So we find it best not to create the article for said film until we know it's almost certain to reach completion (i.e. when the cameras finally roll). Best regards, Steve TC 09:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For The Love Of God Create an X-men Origins:Wolverine Article...You Have Enough Info For A Full Article About The Movie... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.28.91 (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, not until it starts filming, per WP:FUTFILMS. I'm not bothered though to start paragraphing the mini-article now though, as it starts this month. Alientraveller (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Alientraveller. A full article about a film would include the plot, the cast, the production, and various aspects of its release such as box office performance and critical reaction. Considering the delays of superhero films such as Justice League of America and the Superman Returns sequel as well as other major projects especially due to the writers' strike, Wolverine still has not crossed the threshold into production. The threshold exists because the entry into production cannot be guaranteed at all until it actually begins. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 20:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The info about Liev being cast as Stryker is speculative. Some sites are reporting that he will be Sabretooth and Michael C Hall (Dexter) will be young stryker. MikeSims (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not, CHUD is just a rumourmill. Alientraveller (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cast section in future

Is there anyone we might want to leave out for this article in future? The Wolverine cast has its own unique set of mutants, I'm not so sure how many to include, or for that matter how many mutants to include from the previous films. A controversial idea I have is to leave out mutants who only appeared once. Alientraveller (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with the one-time appearances being taken out, but it may be better to move it and make a small paragraph about them. That's if nothings been done yet. Just realised when you wrote this. -- Harish - 15:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magneto script reviews

[7] I'm placing these here for safekeeping. When the film is in production and final plot details emerge, these can be implemented to show how things changed. Alientraveller (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Goyer's rewrite. Alientraveller (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Generation X also be included in this list?

It is also an X-men film, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.11.183 (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A failed television pilot: but there's a good quote from Arad about it in a book, so I will add that. Alientraveller (talk) 11:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

Anyone wanna add budget to the table in # 3.1 Box office performance. Would be good.IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

X-Men Origins: Deadpool confirmed.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/theampersand/archive/2009/05/06/x-men-origins-deadpool-confirmed.aspx