User talk:Landon1980

Help

Since Beastly's filming is soon to begin, I kinda need your help on reviewing this which I created on my sandbox. Beastly. Thanks a lot. Kikkokalabud (talk) 10:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert my edits

I have a simple dream. To correct errors and fully develop the pages in our hallowed Wikipedia. Please do not crush that dream, sir. PLEASE DO NOT CRUSH IT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.88.228.158 (talk) 06:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you blocked him? =

Is User:Very serious editor blocked yet? --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reported him, which is all I can do. Shouldn't be long until an admin gets over to AIV though. Cheers. Landon1980 (talk) 06:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was blocked by Henrik. --T'Shael MindMeld 07:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's good, as it was a very serious matter. Landon1980 (talk) 07:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Very Serious Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hard work fighting vandals as well as beating me to 3+ reverts tonight. T'Shael MindMeld 07:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks. That is my first barnstar, ever. You have beat me a few times as well :). Thanks again. Landon1980 (talk) 07:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. Keep up the good work. :-) --T'Shael MindMeld 07:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I highly disagree with this award, this user reverts anonymous edits and claims they are vandalism even if they aren't. He then uses his status to threat banning you if you disagree. This isn't an attitude that should be applauded. --10:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

OK

"she ain't got shit on me" is the new single from letoya . it wont let me edit it on the discography and sending me warning. source www.letoyaonline.com and http://www.rap-up.com/2009/05/14/letoya-luckett-hints-at-album-guests/

Sorry, I thought you were vandalising for some reason, go ahead and make the edit. Sorry again. Landon1980 (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

conservapedia

it wasn't vandalism, put it back in. trolling conservapedia is like putting a 9volt battery to your tongue, or writing silly answers on a serious test. everyone does it once so they can talk about it later.

User:Hadabadeh

This user has already made a number of bad edits. I suggest that you watch this editor. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 10:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks. Landon1980 (talk) 10:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conservapedia

Don't revert again. I'll do it for you. Piano non troppo (talk) 10:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I don't really mind doing it though. This is obvious vandalism in my opinion, and is exempt from the three revert rule. Landon1980 (talk) 10:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is not vandalism

This title is wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.226.210 (talk) 10:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore Him

I already sent him to ARV for removing templates after warnings. He'll be blocked soon. Ridernyc (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the note. Landon1980 (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how many hangon tags he will place if everyone leaves him alone. Ridernyc (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As many as he can, would be my guess. Landon1980 (talk) 12:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Haha, well, I am flattered that someone would choose me as their scapegoat in stalking you. You, in turn, should feel flattered that someone thought you worthy of being stalked!

To answer your question, no, I didn't understand. In fact, I went back through all of our disagree-ing and agreeing conversations that I could find, and I couldn't understand what would make you so angry as to categorize our conversations as you had. As for the misunderstanding, no problem/apology accepted/and I apologize as well for any of my comments or actions that might have irritated you. Have a great day! Wikiwikikid (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support

Unfortunately, my RFA was closed recently with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}, TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — ^talk

Thanks!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For repeatedly de-vandalizing by repeatedly vandalized user page. Thanks! — Aldaron • T/C 05:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the Vandalism to my page--SKATER ^Speak. 05:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad I could help. Landon1980 (talk) 05:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

high school pages

I really cant be bothered monitoring the unconstructive edits on high school pages!!! Earlypsychosis (talk) 06:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me about it. It is usually a given when you see the words 'high school' the edit is going to be vandalism. Landon1980 (talk) 06:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a Quick Note

This isn't vandalism. All he was doing was adding a {{hangon}} tag to contest his article's nomination for speedy deletion yet you reverted and issued a warning. Authors of articles are allowed to contest speedy deletion, just not supposed to remove the speedy tag. No big deal, just be careful. :) --T'Shael MindMeld 06:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember the actual content of the article, but wasn't the article itself vandalism? That is why I reverted (I think) that and the same user was vandalizing other articles. Thank you for the reverts on my talk page by the way. Also, I've only used Huggle for a few days now, and when I try and tag a page for speedy deletion, or request page protection Huggle freezes and I have to restart. Do you know what the problem may be? Landon1980 (talk) 06:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the article itself was mostly nonsense, he's still allowed to contest its' speedy deletion although no sane admin would agree with him. As you your problems with Huggle, I'm really not too terribly sure. I'm pretty sure there's a trouble shoot list on the Huggle page, so you may want to read that. In the meantime it may be easier to use Twinkle to tag articles and Huggle to just revert vandalism. If you'll look at my monobook.js page I have some script that makes new page patrolling easier as it puts a box right underneath the search bar that displays all the newly created pages. All the best, --T'Shael MindMeld 07:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Summer olympics

I'm pretty sure that 69.107.48.207's edits to the Summer Olympics articles are legit, if not well explained. Somehow the Philippines replaced China as the primary medalist, which if memory serves, was not the case. I'm going to track down who made the initial edits. You might want to remove the warning from that IP (unless it's done other edits that are vandalism). [By the way, I don't blame you for the revert. I almost reverted the IP back again, but paused to consider it more]. Shadowjams (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The offending edit came from 222.126.14.10, which is incidentally in the Philippines. That IP has 3 edits, of which at least 2 are vandalism. They are very sporadic though, so I don't think additional action is required. Shadowjams (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)::No, I don't know how I reverted that, that edit definitely isn't vandalism. I'm still getting used to huggle, I bet I was looking at a revision that was vandalism while huggle had not yet caught up, so I inadvertently reverted the wrong person. I removed the warning and left them a welcome message. I really appreciate you letting me know, otherwise I would have most likely not found my mistake. Thanks again. Landon1980 (talk) 04:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've gotten nasty messages from people before for doing the same thing (doing good faith vandalism patrol but making a mistake, or having my software make a mistake) and I don't want to be one of the nasty ones, but I do want to make sure that I'm not missing some bigger picture. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 04:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Usually every time I finish with Huggle I scan through the majority of my edits to see if I made any mistakes. Oddly enough, most of the mistakes I find I have no recollection of the edit, and have no idea how it happened or who's fault it was (mine or the softwares). I think my accuracy rate is pretty good though, or at least I hope it is. Landon1980 (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warrior

Just because you revert vandalized pages on an internet site doesn't make you a hero of any description, my friend. You'll soon learn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.232.66 (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, and warning. Landon1980 (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it might be of use to you mate.

Ok, thanks again. Landon1980 (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Cop

Who are you to be giving out warnings? Are you a Wiki Cop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.8.14 (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could say that. Kindly stop adding nonsense to that article. I'm sure we would welcome your positive contributions once that particular show airs in your region. –xeno ^talk 07:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't nearly enough thanks...

..but please accept this:

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your help controlling the nonsense that 조커 created. T'Shael MindMeld 07:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :-). I do believe you dealt with him/her more than I did though. I was beginning to wonder if they would ever be blocked. Landon1980 (talk) 07:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For awhile there it seemed like all the admins were on a coffee break..;) --T'Shael MindMeld 07:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk patrol

Thanks for the vandalism revert to my talk page. » skraz ^{talk,contribs} 18:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. Landon1980 (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject User Rehab

Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. Abce2|AccessDenied 04:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like something I may be interested in. I will definitely check it out. Thanks for the invitation. Landon1980 (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hoo hoo ha

~~I reverted a mocking edit on this user's talk page. This is after you gave him a Level 4 Warning--The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

And now he's blocked. It's was nice working with you to stop him. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and nice working with you as well. He/she has been blocked a few times here lately, but keeps coming back. Landon1980 (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Laughs

The guy won't give up. We might have another block on our hands. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is persistent, that's for certain. Landon1980 (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, though rest assured it will be back. Landon1980 (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. But do you think that The Man Who Laughs and Hoo hoo ha could be the same person. They both started vandalising one after the other and they both like the "Why so serious" Joker picture. Maybe we are dealing with a sockpuppeteer. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Yes, they are definitely the same person. There is no need in filing an SPI though, as they can be blocked per WP:DUCK. Landon1980 (talk) 06:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also we both worked together to get rid of those two accounts. The first one attacked you and the second one attacked me. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Guanica

Is there any reason why you reverted this constructive edit as vandalism and then final-warned the article creator? Cunard (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, no. I don't know what I was thinking. I caught my mistake before you posted this, and removed the report I made, and removed the warnings as well. I was confusing this user with another user. Landon1980 (talk) 05:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Keep up the vandal fighting, but remember that accuracy is more important than speed. Best, Cunard (talk) 05:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed is not even my goal, I don't even try to be fast. I just started using huggle a few days ago, so hopefully as I get more used to it my accuracy rate will increase. Based on my 2,500 or so Huggle edits my accuracy rate so far is 99.something percent, my goal of course is 100% =). Cheers. Landon1980 (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do you just deleted it without reason?--74.215.92.204 (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie Bernall

I know we don't agree on the issue, but I'm going to let it play out a bit and then call for a consensus. I'm more than willing to accept the outcome of the consensus however that turns out. I hope the editor doesn't change anything until a consensus is reached. Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a lot of research on the shooting, and this incident as well. As a Christian I think it is a beautiful story, but a story is all it is. I have no desire to fight for her to be remembered as a martyr, when it is blatantly obvious she was just a victim of a senseless shooting. I agree with the official version of what happened to her, the one supported by all the witnesses. Landon1980 (talk) 20:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought there were only 2 witnesses (the guy who thought it was Cassie but later indicated it was from another side of the room and the girl who actually said it, got shot, and survived)? Either way, I don't think Ic's edit's fight for her remembrance as a martyr? That's why his wording said something like, 'at first it was thought she was a marty' and goes on to tell that this has since been brought into question. Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the official version of what happened to her. I can't remember how many witnesses there were, definitely more than two. Craig Scott (the one that mistook Valeen's voice for Cassie's), Emily, then three or four others. I think three is the number of witnesses that signed sworn statements that it didn't happen. Landon1980 (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! What an informative site. That site does show that without a doubt, Cassie was not the one who was taunted about God. However, that does not discredit or take away notability of the fact that initial reports were that Cassie was martyred. I think to take this out takes away due weight. After all, this is what she is most notable for. So to say that she was initially thought to be a martyr is not incorrect. Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I think that should be mentioned. Isn't that already mentioned though? I thought the article made it clear she was initially thought to be a martyr. Landon1980 (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OH, mistaken idenity. I am fairly new and do some minor updates to help my fav band pages, but since my chem page is locked, i came to my 2nd fav. please fill me in on any knowledge of editing. thanks. Felix 12 22 (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying I made a bad edit?, I learned one thing from Fezmar9 on another page and fixed that to the rules of wiki he showed me, and my other edits were very minor, did i make a mistake? Felix 12 22 (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]