Jump to content

Bytham River

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikityke (talk | contribs) at 23:18, 23 June 2009 (reliable reference and removal of "fictional"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Bytham River was an ancient river in paleolithic Britain that ran through the English Midlands until around 450,000 years ago [1]. Its course has been suggested as the route that the first humans to visit Britain took.

The river rose in the vicinity of modern-day Stratford-on-Avon and ran through the Midlands for millennia during the first half of the Pleistocene period. It ran north east towards modern day Leicester then east into East Anglia. At this point it turned south to Bury St Edmunds before turning east again towards Lowestoft and emptying into the southern North Sea.

Much of the river valley was scoured away by the Anglian Stage, but parts were covered and preserved by glacial soil deposits which has enabled geologists and archaeologists to reconstruct its course. It was discovered by a geographer, Professor Jim Rose of the University of London in the 1980s and named after the Lincolnshire village of Castle Bytham where Rose first identified it.

Its wide sand and gravel banks would have provided an easy route to travel along and the river would have provided water, vegetation and attracted animals making it a useful place for humans to exploit. A concentration of Lower Palaeolithic occupation sites dating to before the Anglian glaciation is known along the river's route including Waverley Wood near Coventry and High Lodge, West Dereham, Feltwell, Brandon, Hengrave, Lakenheath and Warren Hill in East Anglia. This indicates that the river was significant to the first inhabitants of Britain who lived between 700,000 and 500,000 years ago. It would have been the largest river in Britain at the time although the second largest river, which was to become the River Thames, shows no similar indication of pre-Anglian human occupation.

References