User talk:Voice of Clam

Malvern station

Hi Voice of Clam! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as being in need of a little attention or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see talk:Great Malvern railway station--Kudpung (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Reference this, thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for, though I can no longer remember why. :) I'm sure I'll have use for it in the future. Cheers! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 16:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re File:Eritrean Railway - Tivedshambo 2008-11-04-edit1.jpg

Hey, yeah, no problem with me. As far as I'm concerned it's your photo, regardless of any edits I may have done, so in my books you can license it as you wish. Cheers, --jjron (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boulton pix

Thanks for the offer. I will give it some thought. What the article needs most, I think, are pictures of stuff Boulton made, other than the coins and the steam engine. However, museums tend to look askance at taking photos of their exhibits. I'd be glad for any ideas though.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Order of Vikings

Uh, sorry, but why exactly do you feel reluctant to speedy delete this? Its eligible under A7, and there aren't any sources to improve the article. Finger z 07:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this was a new article, I'd have deleted it. But it's been around for six years (longer than most articles on Wikipedia), presumably from a time when the notability requirements weren't as stringent as they are now, and that makes me reluctant to delete it without at least some discussion. It's a borderline case, and other admins may have made an alternative decision, but my view is to be a little more lenient for cases of "grandfather rights". If it's been around for that length of time, another week won't hurt. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 07:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional, if it makes you feel better, I don't think it was a bad call, and technically you're correct about it meeting A7. I see you're looking at admin coaching, so this disclaimer may help you if anyone queries any incorrect CSD nominations. Good luck! — Tivedshambo (t/c) 07:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]