User talk:Guillom

Long Now

Salut! Merci beaucoup! Answered you at User_talk:Kim_Bruning/board#.22Long_now.22_section Kim Bruning 23:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in Aymara

Hello Guillom! Could you tell me who should I ask about changing from French back to Spanish the menu from the Wikipedia in Aymara? I know that it should be in Aymara but until then Spanish is the next best thing because Aymara is spoken in Bolivia and Peru. Thank you MariusMa

Deletion

hello, i couldnt email you so i will contact you this way. i tried to make a page on here and immediately YOU deleted it...i would like to know what gives you the right to do this? my information had a history to it and i think it should be on here for others to see. please email me.. bigbirdkatrina@btinternet.com to explain your actions. thankyou Katrina1972

Stewardship

My oppose was actually based slightly on your many neutral votes saying "I don't know this person"... maybe I saw it that way because doing so at WP:RFA on en would probably result in a strong warning for disruption. I just think if you didn't know them you could ask around, or just not vote at all. – Ch acor 07:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Oversight

Thanks for letting me know and for the congratulations! Flcelloguy (A note?) 20:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Night Gyr desysopping

Corvus appears to have misinterpreted the statement. Please examine the specific text, the user announced he would be sending a copy of the article (about Allison Stokke) to Allison Stokke herself, not the press. I believe you may made a slight error, your thoughts? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. His statement was ambiguous enough to require an emergency procedure (that was asked by people from your wiki). I knew there was a possibility of misspelling, but there was also a possibility of disclosure. I desysopped him to let the time for the ArbCom to look into this case or for him to explain himself. If he was really about to disclose deleted bio content, risks were high and action was necessary. If it was only a misunderstanding, losing his admin tools during a few hours was no big deal, and any bureaucrat would give him his tools back without any problem. Cheers, guillom 20:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I asked - I saw the edit, went "WHAT ON EARTH" and went to the stewards IRC channel. Note that I'm not an arbitrator, so I couldn't make such a request myself - Guillom advised to find an arb as quickly as possible, which I am now doing - David Gerard 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Thanks for the heads up, I've sent an e-mail now. I missed that notice. Cheers, --Deskana (talk) 20:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the off chance you're reading this, I replied again with more details. --Deskana (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temperature Responsive Polymers

Yeah it's still a pet project. I'm not sure how it will look in the end, so I have been relying on editing revisions performed by other people that give me new ideas to make the article look more Encyclopaedic without losing its academic authenticity (through reviewed reading). It's moving along and I'm tracking the progress and hoping it will look beautiful in the end. I plan on linking to many other articles, I didn't even realize poly-NIPAAm has shown up as an article until now, so I hope to add to that one as well. Though change is slow for me, I have limited time as I'm working on my own research at the moment. Thanks again Mjmacky (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French Presidential Election

Do not revert my contribution without any control. Results by commune do not already exist. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blanchisserie (talk • contribs) 12:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ca fait la 2e fait que tu revertes sans checker: 1) les résultats par commune ne sont pas présents 2) si tu avais eu la peine de lire le bulletin des administrateurs, tu aurais vu que l'on est tombé d'accord. Merci donc de ne pas reverter sans réfléchir, à moins que tu ne veuilles une guerre d'édition ?--Blanchisserie 13:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Spot Image

Bonjour Guillom, comment ca va aujourd'hui? Following the discussion you started on the administrators' noticeboard, I've unblocked Spot Image (talk · contribs). I believe you would give some guidance to the user; this would be a great idea. Neıl 龱 09:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after a big fuss, the user is unblocked (phew!) - it might be a good idea to suggest to them they rename their account so it does not match that of the company. Neıl 龱 12:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on with this? It was decided on the AN thread that the user should change his name or face re-blocking. It's been more than a week now and no name change has occurred. Are you still working on this? pschemp | talk 21:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am; I also happen to be working on my Ph.D thesis, which takes most of my time, as you can tell from my contributions. This user has emailed me on July 10th about the renaming, and I have replied to him today. He has been following my advice to stop editing until the name is changed, so what's the urgency? guillom 11:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is done now. guillom 17:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PA

Hi Guillom, on wp:en, we apply : wp:NPA. Regards, Ceedjee (talk) 14:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardez qui parle... guillom 14:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"See who is talking" ...

Are you refering to IRC or to emails ? Maybe both ?

Whatever what you are refering to, I invite you to cool down (or to write such things by emails).

On the communautary space, you are expected to respect wp:civil and once more, you didn't respect wp:npa.

Cheers, Ceedjee (talk) 14:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I didn't revert you, I moved your comment to my talk page, as it was addressed to me and not to Jimbo. I don't see why Jimbo should endure agressive discussions on his talk page if they have nothing to do with him. guillom 14:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)"

In that case, don't be agressive, per wp:AGF, wp:civil and wp:NPA.

And particularly not on his talk page. Ceedjee (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ceedjee, tu m'envoies des emails d'insultes et de menaces et tu veux me donner des leçons de politesse ? C'en devient risible. guillom 15:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a forum. On the talk pages, we are assumed to deal with content discussion or topics related with wikipedia functionning.

By the way, I never threatened you, by email or by any other way. My email was maybe insulting. That is a point of view I can understand. It followed your personal attack on this communautary space.

If you have something linked with wp to tell me, please, leave me a message on my talk page.

If you have something personal to tell me, please, send me an email.

Cheers, Ceedjee (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai rien de plus à dire à un clown comme toi, mais si tu as l'occasion de revenir me donner de bons fous rires, n'hésite pas. guillom 15:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha

Now I need to make an other cake! Caymalin! -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Budelberger

Hi I see you blocked this troublesome account on meta.wiki. He has been blocked in numerous other wikis, too, for gross incivility, intimidation, trollishness etc. What do you think, could an all-wiki ban be achieved (because I'm getting tired of his incivility and, generally, being a dick behaviour). The sysop who indef blocked him in French wiki did this with a good rationale summarizing personnage visiblement incapable de travailler en collaboration harmonieuse avec qui que ce soit) [1]. Note that the personnage concerned had got blocked a number of time already in fr.wiki, with mere 336 (!) edits by him there. I think something needs to be done. --Miacek (t) 21:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Information graphics

Hi. I was just wondering why you removed the interwiki link here? From your userpage, I'll infer that you know way more than I do (in these and most matters!), but I had previously assumed that the default action was to link an interwiki article regardless of its quality-at-the-moment. (My not being able to read/translate the French article is possibly contributing to my confusion ;)

I'm just curious, and looking to learn the nuance :) -- Quiddity (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]