Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sculpt 4D

Sculpt 4D

Non-notable software. Google search for "Sculpt 4D" -wiki gives almost nothing. Articles has no references at all (tagged with citation request since Sptember 2007). I couldn't find any magazine or newspaper reviewing it. Tagged for notability for almost 2 years. In the "news" section of its site (http://sculpt4d.com/index.php) there are no news at all. Magioladitis (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Sculpt 3D & redirect. This product has some minimal news coverage, but really is just an updated version of Sculpt 3D (which has considerably more coverage) so I feel merging is the best option. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge : I was making a joke comment earlier about using an IBM 1620 in high school. It turns out that there are historical articles on various computer items, including repositories for antique software. Does he have the source code? Even if you merge with a related product, make sure that related product links to the historical computer stuff. I still have a hard time of thinking about 1986 as historical, but I still think my computer has 512k or RAM, not 512M LOL... Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Sculpt 3D per User:ThaddeusB. JIP | Talk 18:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: there is such considerable overlap that currently there is more information on Sculpt3D in the Sculpt4D article than in its own. 4D was created four minutes after 3D so it has priority rights. Merge to there to avoid accidental WP:CFORK. Enki H. (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]