User talk:76.95.66.209

Well Start Talking!

Warning

You are pursuing a vendetta. You are attempting to continue an edit war by other means. Your comments concerning sockpuppetry are absurd, and you have ignored warnings that you are discrediting your own cause by your belligerence in the face of polite explanation by a large number of editors. I suggest for your own sake that you stop and consider how you might contribute constructively to the encyclopedia instead of trying to argue with everyone who comes into contact with you. Acroterion _(talk) 18:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were warned; your continuing assumption of bad faith and formulation of conspiracies against you are unacceptable. It is also clear that you are evading the block on your named account. Acroterion _(talk) 12:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.95.66.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1: I am not MataNui44. You are disgracing wikipedia by assigning a random block. I was never warned. You will not get any personal information from me to disprove that I'm MataNui. I will contact wikipedia and alert them of the random, unfair, punishing blocks that have been assigned wrongly. I will include your username, and I will include TRP's for the high admin's review, which I do believe should shed some light on this corrupted block.--76.95.66.209 (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reason, just a lot of finger pointing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I happen to know that 76.95.66.209--who hasn't a discete screen ID at this moment--is not this 'MataNui44'. So how do you like them apples ?

I also can point out that I have been blocked, or banned or whatever from editing Wikipedia even though I've never attempted to do so, despite it often being obviously and seriously warranted...because I don't care. It so happens that I handle my own research and if Wikipedia says this or that, I confirm it in some legitimate source because it has been my experience that there are usually some fence sitters who climb up and occupy a position they feel is important and swat down any newcomers, however talented or correct they may be. This happens all too often on various sites and is quite common. Wikipedia is no different and should you care to show me how it has effective controls to prevent some know-it-all or other from controlling 'the board' as it were, I'd be happy to listen.

Otherwise, the exercise I am reading here only confirms that I am money ahead by not bothering myself with what Wikipedia is or does, particularly that part where you are painting user (76...) as 'MataNui44.' My true name and the one I always use as I stand behind my statements (including those here) is Randy Stone and you may find me at various sites such as 'All the World's Battlecruisers,' 'The Unofficial Krugman Page' and 'Nihon Kaigun.'

Once again, you are blocking one user while assuming somehow--it appears--that he is another user.

Good Day, gentlemen.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.95.66.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You admins are the ones whom have called me "MataNui44". And for you there's no reason to unblock because it isn't in your interest to do so, because you are playing favorites.

Decline reason:

Well, no reason to unblock means you will stay blocked. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

76.95.66.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I'm not the person whom I was accused of being. But that is the twist and cover story for blocking me for standing up to them. I deserve the unblocking because it's what is right.--76.95.66.209 (talk) 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I should be unblocked because I'm not the person whom I was accused of being. But that is the twist and cover story for blocking me for standing up to them. I deserve the unblocking because it's what is right.--[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209#top|talk]]) 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I should be unblocked because I'm not the person whom I was accused of being. But that is the twist and cover story for blocking me for standing up to them. I deserve the unblocking because it's what is right.--[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209#top|talk]]) 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I should be unblocked because I'm not the person whom I was accused of being. But that is the twist and cover story for blocking me for standing up to them. I deserve the unblocking because it's what is right.--[[Special:Contributions/76.95.66.209|76.95.66.209]] ([[User talk:76.95.66.209#top|talk]]) 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.