User talk:Jfdwolff

New messages at the bottom, please.
If you leave messages here, please expect a response from me over here.
If I've left a message on your talkpage, and I'm slow to respond to a reply made there, please let me know.

RFC on extrasolar planet lists restructuring

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_extrasolar_planets#Restructuring_discussion

If you belive this is worth your time, perhaps you could turn the attention of a few other people, besides the few people there already there, that you think would not mind having a look/say. GabrielVelasquez (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linezolid

I've explained some of the more jargon-heavy stuff, such as Gram-positive, post-antibiotic effect, high bioavailability etc. If you have any further suggestions, they'd be greatly appreciated, after working on this article for eleven months, it's safe to say my strategic distance is completely shot :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosuvastatin.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosuvastatin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

care to assist?

I hope to go live with User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/National Fibromyalgia Association within the next day or so. If anyone can expand a section, add a source, or corect a typo... please help out. Thanks, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 22:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking my opinion. I think the article is of good quality and well sourced to reliable sources. I have no comments currently. JFW | T@lk 12:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster Headaches

Hello, I'm not sure why you felt the links to articles and information, provided by the City of London Migraine Clinic, that I added to the Cluster Headaches were inappropriate. It is a registered charity providing an invaluable service. The Clinic and I have nothing to gain from passing this information on so it can be of used by those that would benefit from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssim24 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADHD

We just finished arbitration. Strong sactions are in place. Therefore edit warring should not occur. Cheers. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rashash always

Could you please pay some attention to the lack of participation of the vexing editor in the discussion page on Rashash ...? The vexing editor was very prompt to denounce legitimate changes in the disambiguation page... but when it becomes constructive, where are the proponents of the official consensus? You did not even comment on the proposition... just argued that we "do not seem to agree". There is no problem of agreement, simply a disdain of what is proposed and a lack of discussion. What can be wrong in the propostion of making the Sar Shalom Sharabi page the main topic and the other Lithuanian Rabbi referenced in a hatnote. So many disambiguation pages use this third scenario. What would be wrong to do so here? (except having to disagreee with a false consensus) 84.109.111.130 (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]