Jump to content

User talk:Dendodge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jmiles1107 (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 4 August 2009 (→‎Requesting Assistance for recently deleted Company Page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Dendodge/header

Smile!

Spotlight Newsletter

Wikipedia:Spotlight/Newsletter/2024/July

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Cavernous GA

Looks as though you've been away for a while; I've added a bit more to the article to try and help meet what we're hearing is needed, but I'm not sure what your take is on the evolving discussion and what you yourself think should happen. So I feel I should now leave it in your hands. But don't hesitate to let me know if there's anything further I can do to help. PL290 (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter XXVII

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Assistance for recently deleted Company Page

Dendodge - Recently, Integration Point was deleted. I have been working on this article for several months and it went several months without any tags. The latest problem was that I did not have enough "notability", even though I had 11 credible sources. I am new to this - which is one reason that I picked you out from the Editor Assistance b/c you said that you had trouble when you were new as well. I am just completely unsure of where to go from here. I believe it is important for this company to have an information page for anyone who is interested, much like GOOGLE and IBM and everyone else. Also - there is another article, Management Dynamics that I used as a guideline when writing Integration Point. The references in that article are not as weighted as the references in Integration Point - why is it that no one has marked that page for not meeting Wiki standards? Any insight into the deletion of my article and how Wiki works overall would be helpful. It seems to me that administrators tend to be bias toward certain articles. Thanks for listening. Jmiles1107 (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]