User talk:170.206.224.50

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Erich von Manstein has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cannonballs has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): googlepages\.com (links: http://resurrectcannonballs.googlepages.com/index.html).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jason C. Miller has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topic banned from Scientology topics

Wikipedia's arbitration committee earlier this year decided a case in which accounts with a single purpose of promoting Scientology may be banned from editing that topic for one year by any uninvolved Wikipedia administrator. See: Wikipedia:ARBSCI#Single purpose accounts with agendas. Numerous accounts associated with the Church of Scientology itself have been specifically identified and sanctioned for abusive activity on Wikipedia, in that case and other actions.

Recent activity on David Miscavage indicates that you are such a single purpose account. A cluster of new accounts and IP addresses are involved in this editing and all are being topic banned for the year.

If you violate this topic ban you may be blocked from editing.

Please limit your Wikipedia contributions to unrelated topics.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly not a single purpose account and have edited in a variety of subjects! How do you get this idea??? Yes, there seems to be single opinion editing ongoing in the biographical article you mention. And it should be investigated. Just the last edits to the article clearly removed legit material to the effect of slanting the article in a certain direction and violated a neutral point of view. I think the Arbitration Committee should look into this. 170.206.224.50 (talk) 08:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.