Jump to content

Talk:Obesity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 91.154.204.152 (talk) at 18:13, 11 August 2009 (→‎USA: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleObesity has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 24, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
October 1, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
December 19, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 14, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconMedicine: Cardiology GA‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Review of obesity in the developing world

Caballero B (2001). "Introduction. Symposium: Obesity in developing countries: biological and ecological factors". J. Nutr. 131 (3): 866S–870S. PMID 11238776. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

--Doc James (talk · contribs · email)

This article is horribly biased against the obese

If you read this article you believe obesity exist because lazy people eat too much. It makes no mention of changes in food production(such as the use of high fructose corn syrup)or analgesics(which slows metabolism). The idea that corporations are totally innocent or that this is just pure laziness is a spiteful argument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YVNP (talkcontribs) 09:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't read like that to me at all, and I'm what would be considered morbidly obese. If I disagreed with the articles POV I wouldn't have put my pics up to be used on here. - FatM1ke (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that these areas above need further discussion. They are however discussed somewhat under social determinants of obesity. I have not yet have time to add more of this content but will at some point. Thanks for the comments.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I'll add the information. I know from medical reports pain killers cause fast weight gain for one. I'll add themYVNP (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes if it is well referenced please do. For medical stuff best to reference to a review. Cheers.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it is a little biased. Specifically the word normal should not be used to describe people who are not overweight or obese. Who is to say what is normal and not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.118.49.50 (talk) 21:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you prefer it to be changed to healthy?Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USA

why isnt obesity in USA discussed in this article? It is in the heart of this issue, majority of americans and obese and majority of obese people are Americans.