Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 4 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Content Fork
I would note that User:EarlWhitehaven has created a WP:CFORK of this article at Expelled controversy. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- This is an intentional fork, without any effort to use summary style. The semi-informative diff of the current versions. Just merge it back in, I think. M 07:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Rotten Tomatoes Change
The actual percentage is 10% not 8% as the page says, it's a minor edit but I can't make it since the page is not editable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strictscrutiny (talk • contribs) 19:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- thanks, I have updated this. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 19:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Kevin Miller
Kevin Miller is now working on a film about Kent Hovind according to this press release. Should we include a note about that in the article? It seems as of yet that Miller is not notable enough for his own article nor is this new film. JoshuaZ (talk) 01:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to see something more than a press release. Sometimes (I'm not speculating this is the case here) press releases are too much like "the checks in the mail" and it may be premature to put anything here yet. Good catch, though - I'll keep my eye out. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 10:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
"Evolutionary scientists"
Can we construct a better title for that section? Shermer isn't a scientist. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
PZ Myers on the phone for the conference
Do we have any non-blog sources for that exchange? If not, I'm not sure it should be included in the article. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
NPOV
I believe that this article lacks NPOV. Those editing the article appear to be using words and phrases that have a negative connotation instead of using more diplomatic ones. (ie "claims", as opposed to "according to"; or "alleges", as opposed to "reports" or something less inflammatory).
At the very least, I'd like to state that adding the tag for contested NPOV is simply an admission that NPOV is contested, not that the article is incorrect. I apologize for not signing proper - noob.
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- Film articles with archived peer reviews
- WikiProject Film articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Creationism articles
- Low-importance Creationism articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles
- Old requests for peer review