User talk:Cookiehead

Welcome!

Hello, Cookiehead, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Censoring Wikipedia

Hi...I reverted your delete of the drawing due to wikipedia policy regarding censorship. Please see the policy here: Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED -Kukini ^{háblame aquí}

That wasn't about censorship. Someone's doodling isn't worthy of an encyclopedia. See WP:YOURDOODLESUCKS.Cookiehead (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cute response. But it was censoring with no explanation nor discussion. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 16:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was removing a doodle that has no place on a wikipedia. You call it censorship, I call it doodle removing. Put up a good pictoral, not something you scratched out on your notebook. I don't care if you post a film clip of "Linda Lovelace Takes It From Behind" just as long as its not your home movie.

Per your support and others comments, I have included a comment in the article about Senator Biden's hair transplant. It is not shameful, not like a penis enlargement surgery. It is documented and I've used a references from the Times (London) newspaper, a very well respected newspaper. I definitely don't want to mock him, just want WP to be comprehensive. 903M (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

accused?

I think you are being accused of being a SPA on Joe Biden's talk page (hair). 903M (talk) 05:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's an SPA? If my comments created soothing heat and humidity for some overly excited biographers, I apologize. Tina Fey got a jab in on Biden's hair situation last night, further confirming that topic's place in pop culture in regards to the good Senator from Delaware. I just looked at the talk page and they're talking about another editor, not me.

Bears

I'm surprised the Bears article is still FA - then again, I am also surprised at the number of NFL-related articles that are still possess GA-status. If you want a field day, read through Chicago Cubs :p. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 18:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Caan

Hello. We don't call James Caan award-winning in the article on him, and there is even less reason to do so in the article on his son. Terms like that are discouraged by WP:PEACOCK, which is a style guideline.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 00:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]