user talk:pablo X
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Diversi%C3%B3n_de_Espa%C3%B1a.jpg/200px-Diversi%C3%B3n_de_Espa%C3%B1a.jpg)
Another Discussion at RfAr
Hi pablomismo...I have sited references for many of the statements in nandamuro balakrishna ( http:http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_italic.png//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandamuri_Balakrishna), But why are you deleting the whole article, If you feel something is biased, please let me know, i will try to get the referece for that.Please let it have atleast biorgraphy and filmography, which cant be biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.33.254 (talk) 13:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody's deleting the whole article. NBK is a notable actor, and deserves an article.
- However - his fan site is not a reliable source, neither are blogs, nor is the likes of Telugupedia, or the IMDB. So we then have a problem - we need to find sources that are unbiased, reliable, and give us a high degree of confidence that what they report is fact.
- I agree that there should be biography and filmography sections, but we need to take out opinions that are not written from a neutral point of view. For instance
- he is good in all types of roles
- Balakrishna always experimented with roles that would inhibit other stars
- This is one of the unique feats that none of his contemporaries would ever dare to try
- are all opinion rather than fact.
- In addition claims that are made such as
- Film pundits thought Balakrishna deserved a Nandi for his Peddannyya performance
- claim to know what "film pundits thought". We need a reference so that we can read what the pundits thought rather than having an interpretation of it presented to us as fact.
- Do you see the problem? pablohablo. 20:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Update - I have added some suggestions, and sources, to the talk page - these only go up to 2005 so far, there is much more out there. pablohablo. 20:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Suspension-bb-lorelei-9016-jonwoods.jpg/200px-Suspension-bb-lorelei-9016-jonwoods.jpg)
Dealing with an unsuccessful RfA candidate
Hey there. I just saw that you removed the prod tag from Tootsie Duvall, I was just wondering if you could explain your action a bit more. Thanks, NW (Talk) 12:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think there's a fair chance that she is sufficiently notable and intend to research further (though probably not today). If I come up with nothing I'll AfD it (unless someone else has in the meantime). pablohablo. 13:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sure thing then. I didn't find anything that I considered evidence of notability, but perhaps you will have better luck. NW (Talk) 18:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Agency
Anthony Giddens gives a good view on structure/agency problems. The idea is that there are multiple feedback loops between agency and structure (both positive and negative). Some actions generate structure but other actions may take structure as a given (in a nested sense, you can consider the structure creating actions as taking some other structure as given). It is a nice escape from the obviously incorrect enlightenment view of rationality and individuality and the stifling post-modern Foucauldian view of structure as dominating and totalizing. Protonk (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I will read up on this a bit, it is certainly an interesting (and intuitively sensible) view. pablohablo. 08:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
This may help you
I noticed that you added the reference to Camponotus saundersi, it looks like by hand. First of all thanks for adding this reference.
This: User:Ikip/ref may help you a lot! I love this tool, it makes life so much easier when adding references. Ikip (talk) 20:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- No I use the cite tool, space the lines out by hand because I find it easier to check and spot references later.
I noticed you'd changed 'poison' to 'glue', I was considering doing that but it seems that there are some varieties of this ant who have one, and some who have the other (see article talk page.) Know any antologists? pablohablo. 20:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft
At 09:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Anna Lincoln approved this change. See discussion on her talk page. I will now make the change again.Bobbieball (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)