Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals — Keith Urban
Appearance
- ITunes Originals — Keith Urban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per precedent, iTunes Originals albums are not notable. This one doesn't seem any different from the others — no reliable secondary sources, no third-party reviews, etc. Only source is a link to iTunes store, no secondary sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: All that I can find for significant coverage is [1] and [2]. Joe Chill (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Joe Chill's articles look to me like significant coverage. It's not much, but I think it's enough keep the article. Despite the general idea that iTunes Originals albums are usually not notable, this one looks like an exception. Timmeh 20:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC) - Keep per Joe Chill's diggings-up. Wiwaxia (talk) 01:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep as there seems enough coverage of this, and the inclusion of several new songs seems to merit the independent status of the release.