User talk:Abductive

SBA 504 Loan

Hey can I know why my changes keep getting rerolled on the SBA 504 Loan Page, I have nothing against the rules on it yet you continuously undo my changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.82.161.66 (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• Your spam got the article deleted, Chris, and I rewrote it without the spam. Stop spamming, the jig is up. Abductive (reasoning) 18:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Just curious how was that article considered spam? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.82.161.66 (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• The links to your website and youtube channel. How much money do you earn taking people for a ride, huh? Abductive (reasoning) 18:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• If you look at the links to both, they are informative items about the SBA 504 Loan Program.
  • You are scum. Spammer scum. Abductive (reasoning) 19:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• How can I get in contact with a higher admin? I don't appreciate your biased opinion, that you for some reason have about me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.82.161.66 (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Please do. Go to Wikipedia:List of administrators. The more people that see your spam, the less your spam will succeed. Abductive (reasoning) 19:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Abductive. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Balcony nightclub

Hey, mate. I just wanted to apologize for jumping on you so hard on the Afd board. I stand by everything I said, but I should have done it here on your talk page. To be honest, I am just really, really tired of being lectured by people (not specifically refering to you here) on these AfD boards. I always give due dilligence to articles when on New Page Patrol, and I am usually very willing to withdraw a nomination if subsequent research turns up reliable sources. But these boards have really changed over the years, and it seems to be common practice (again, not specifically refering to you here) for people to just use it as a soapbox. Let's bury the hatchet, and our wit, and go on with the serious business at hand, with no hard feelings. Deal? ;o)

RFA spam

Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing

—Kww(talk) 18:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

SBA 504 Loan

Thanks for the rewrite! Hobit (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

• No prob! Abductive (reasoning) 01:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Was trying to get this to work, but you responded too quickly:

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For a rewrite of the spammy SBA 504 Loan article.Hobit (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

• • • Anything that is covered in a "For Dummies" book needs to be properly covered on Wikipedia. Abductive (reasoning) 01:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
      • Can't argue with that. Hobit (talk) 01:57, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Invitation

WT:Sock_puppetry#Interview_for_Signpost. - Dank (push to talk) 18:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

h-index

I am horrified to think about what my h-index might be. Brian E. Logan, a/k/a Bearian (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

• Mine's non-zero. :( Abductive (reasoning) 19:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Eric Schiller

Hi, Eric Schiller isn't unreliable. He publishes lots of books for the masses, beginers books and books aimed at lower graded chess players. That makes the books uninteresting to high class chess players. Because they are not appealing to best players that are easy to receive bad reviews from top players because the contents, in the chess sense, it not appealing. SunCreator (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

• The consensus at the AfD is that he made up the names. Abductive (reasoning) 00:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!

Thanks for the welcome and the advice! --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)