Jump to content

Talk:Tom Suozzi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bflorio12 (talk | contribs) at 16:53, 3 November 2009 (→‎There's a back and forth editing rally going on). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Sept 6 birthday? Is it really? Chivista 19:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI unabashed

that s/b better than naked. Bona Fides 20:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI debate win

I gave Suozzi in the win in this article because it doesn't matter. Bona Fides 19:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC) I gave Suozzi the win in the Suozzi article because Suozzi claimed victory. The Albany Times Union said that by appearing on the same plaftorm Suozzi wins. Otter news pundits (incl. Baruch Prof Munzio) said that by not making any gaffes, Spitzer won. Therefore both guys won. This is possible in politics, but not in baseball. Bona Fides[reply]


Should "Thomas Suozzi" be just "Tom Suozzi"? Also, I am going to change the picture on the front page to this one. Unless there are objections, I will change it. --Blue387 18:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a back and forth editing rally going on

Someone keeps deleting properly cited sections of Thomas Suozzi's page and they keep having to be re-added. Please stop deleting sections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bflorio12 (talkcontribs) 15:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the sections and semi-protected the article for three days. — ξxplicit 16:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You missed one paragraph. I've restored it.