User talk:Hammersoft

Stanley Kubrick

Hammersoft, I have replied on my talk page to your concerns about the Kubrick article. Feel free to remove this from your page when you have viewed it.--WickerGuy (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a bit of rethinking on photo priorities. --WickerGuy (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of restricted use of these images

Thanks for pointing it out to me through your edits. I'll toss them off my user page. Sorry for the inconvenience. Qwrk (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem at all! Thanks for the pleasant response :) --Hammersoft (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I Ask You Something?

Can you please edit-protect the page recently created by me, Quinn Lord? Thank you, and reply as soon as possible. -- Jarrod K (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

No, because I'm not an administrator. Further, articles aren't usually protected from editing unless they are experiencing significant vandalism from multiple sources. In the future, if you want a page protected you should make your case at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. What I have done is remove the image File:Quinn Lord.jpg from the page, since we don't permit the use of fair use images to depict living people, and tagged the image as replaceable fair use, orphaned, and lacking a rationale for use. I've also noted a number of other problems with your image uploads. More to your talk page in a minute. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanx from FkpCascais

Hello Hammersoft. Many thanx again for solving a groing problem I was having. Well, I tryied to resolve the issue in nice way, but it was going nowhere. He is hemophilia sick so I didn´t wanted to come this fare... He is a monarchic fanatic, and as I told him that I wasn´t that way oriented and that I didn´t wanted to involve in politics, just football here in Wiki, I started to get all kind of (funny I must admit) insults from him. I try to explain him that he couldn´t/shouldn´t impose his belives to no one, and that it was his thing to be monarchic, and that I respect that. What I think the real situation happend here is that the guy is sick, he must have had some kind of help that the Serbian royal family of Karadjordjevic gives to many children there, so he now thinks his goal in life is to be royal fanatic. He´s a child I think, so I think/hope that no serious harm will come out from here. But he was starting to be seriously annoying. I hope he learns the lesson from the block. Many thanx again. FkpCascais (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was repeatedly warned about personal attacks, and was nearly blocked for that before he began to insult you. If this behavior of his should continue, please let me know or contact an administrator by posting to WP:AN/I. Let them know in the process that there has been a series of personal insults not just to you but others as well, and that he has been repeatedly warned before. He certainly has a right to his beliefs. He doesn't have a right to push them on others or insult them when they do not share his beliefs. --Hammersoft (talk) 04:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I totally agree with you. I havent knew that other people suffered as well. This changes everything. He must learn to respect others, if not, his place is not here. This is not a kindergarden and we don´t have to tolerate spoiled people. If he attacks me again, I´ll certainly not let it pass. Let´s see... FkpCascais (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the HELL!!!!

wHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?! Ever since Wikipedia was created, people could use any photo on their userpage. Now what is wrong with Sapsltl's? Besides, you called yourself, so you are one.Youretard. S H 6 05:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]