User talk:Hugarh

. Do keep playing Victuallers (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:William Perry (boxer), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 17:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Laver (seaweed). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Come Sail Away. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to your being blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Deconstructhis. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

[Copied and pasted from my own talk page.]

In the past week i have made 4 edits to talk pages, all of which have been true and all of which have been deleted as vandalism. I am going to go round the pages I had edited and revert them to how i edited them, and i trust you will not break Wikipedia:Etiquette#How_to_avoid_abuse_of_talk_pages again, and i hope you realise how rude deleting a talk page comment is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugarh (talk • contribs) 16:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you're patrolling recent changes in articles, as I sometimes enjoy doing, and you're trying to decide whether or not a particular change represents a joke or test edit, there's sometimes a certain amount of guess work going on, but I try to apply a set of criteria based mostly on context. For instance, when I came across this unsigned edit of yours [1], it seemed rather outside of the scope of the talk page of an article with a type of algae as its only topic; call me a stickler if you want to; but it looks like a "joke" or test edit and I deleted it. As is a common practice when patrolling for vandalism, I then checked out other edits that you'd made as well as the contents of your user page at the time: [2] to gain context. I noticed that you did submit a useful contribution back in March of 2008 in the form of a base article for Holbeche House which is appreciated, but in short, it is very difficult for other editors to take any of your edits seriously when they consist of this sort of material:[3],that was added to my talk page again, unsigned. I took note that the current version of your talk page[4] indicates that you eventually hope to become an "administrator". If you are in fact serious about that and want to make a good start toward that goal, I'd like to suggest that you spend some more time reviewing Wiki's policies regarding how to contribute to the encyclopedia, in terms of things like how to properly reference your contributions WP:CITE when you add them and perhaps just as importantly, how to properly interact with other editors WP:AGF. If you have any questions please contact me [...] on my talk page. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to re add material to talk pages, that contextually appears to consist of nonsense unrelated to both the subject or the improvement of the article itself, such as you did here[5]. Continuing this sort of disruptive editing may result in you being blocked from editing the encyclopedia. thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about any trouble you have experienced. My school's I.P. is blocked due to vandalism, and when i logged in on friday my friend must of seen me entering my password, and has proceeded to vandalise pages. i am sorry. We do, however know someone called Tom Lavers, and he IS related to William Perry. it's just a little outside of the pages topic. i will change my password and do my best to cover my keyboard when entering it.--Hugarh (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)