Talk:Breaching round

Firearms Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Slug? Or powder suspended in a matrix of wax?

The article was modified to say the payload was a slug of zinc. I read that the round's payload was metallic powder suspended in a matrix of wax. I find that more reasonable to think powder would lose velocity and become much less dangerous that to think a slug, no matter how deformed would become less dangerous. -- Geo Swan 04:03, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hinges or lock mechanism?

the article suggests both, though on TV i've seen only the "hinge method" Mang 03:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)AS SEEN ON TV! LOL Come on, is this even a discussion. I can tell you we use Breaching Rounds exclusively on lock mechanisms. Not knocking any other method, it is just our "departments" policy. 75.17.194.240 (talk) 04:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)JOE[reply]