Jump to content

User talk:Burkharc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs) at 06:16, 11 December 2009 (Windpower: move signature down a bit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Burkharc! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Windpower

[edit]

I've removed your contribution there, and here is the explanation, which i hope you will take to heart, and not be discouraged by:

Most of this was redundant information that is handled at Environmental effects of wind power, and it contains some errors as well. For instance the sentence "A study in 2001 concluded that 90 percent of the raptures killed in united stated where from wind power turbines in California." is incorrect - if we go to the source it says: "A 2001 summary that examined raptor mortality rates from studies in 10 states estimated that over 90 percent of the raptors killed annually in the United States by wind power turbines occurred in California." - which is quite different. (ie- 90% of raptors killed by wind power where killed in California not 90% of all raptors killed where from wind power in California). On noise you have to bear in mind that the decibel scale is a logarithmic scale, so a comparison of the figures 95-106.5 db to 110-140 db may be misleading

--Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]