Talk:Calkin algebra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scineram (talk | contribs) at 12:15, 11 December 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

'Minimal ideal'? I can understand why the quotient by a maximal ideal might be simple. Charles Matthews 19:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

should be maximal to justify the simplicity claim, i think. it's actually the unique norm-closed ideal. Mct mht 14:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the role separability plays? My guess is it is needed for the maximality of the ideal. Now that I think about it on a huge space the operators with separable range might form an ideal bigger than the compacts. Scineram (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]