User talk:Pielover87
Note
Note: if this account has vandalised a page, it wasn't me! There's 2 people that use this computer, me and my brother. He likes to vandalise sometimes and I open a can of whoopass on him whenever he does. If there's a lot of vandalism coming from this account don't block it for too long please! pielover87 01:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- If that is the case you should probably log out before having him use the computer and make sure your browser does not save your password. richjkl 00:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks!
Umm, when did i do vandalism? This about peer review on uncle tom's cabin? I changed my mind about that and removed the tag right after i put it on the talk page.
Vandalizing user pages is not a good way to convince people that your article should not be deleted. This violates our agreement from earlier. Commit further vandalism and I will block you. android79 21:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Android79. --Nlu 03:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
255
I undid your move of 255 (number) to 255 article. You did two wrong things:
- You moved an article with copy and paste, instead of the "move" feature.
- You interchanged the number and the year article, that is against the conventions.
Please use more care. If you are in doubt about something, please ask first. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I've blocked your account for 1 hour, so there can't be any more vandalism coming from your computer (as I see that there are good contributions from this account). However, you have to read the Blocking policy and see that your account could be deemed a "public account", which is blockable for long periods of time. I recommend that you change your password and to not select the "Remember me" option while logging in. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Removal of in-text citations
This message is regarding the article North American Man/Boy Love Association. In-text citations serve an important purpose and should not be removed unless there is a consensus to do so. I consider this to be a type of vandalism, and it has been reverted. Please stop doing this, or you will, once again, be blocked from editing. Thank you. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 01:52, Dec. 31, 2005
Those citations were fucking the page up.