Talk:History of the European Cup and UEFA Champions League
 | Football B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
who won the champions league as player as well as coach. I am sure about Munez, Ancelotti and Cruyff! Are there more?
Thx Peter
someone can explaine me that phrase:
"The 1965 competition is memorable more for the infamous and controversial semi-final between Internazionale and Liverpool, with widespread allegations of bribery and match fixing being levelled at the Italian side following a 3-0 home win in Milan"
we need something more than rumors comin' out in the 60's from some trash tabloids of Liverpool....
i've changed that voice.
Samoano.
British bias
This article is a bit marred by too much attention put on British facts, especially non-relevant ones (for example, I removed descriptions of ALL mediocre results of English teams after their return in 1991). Also, NPOV phrases like "a young exciting team" area clearly to be put off.
"The consequence was a 5-year ban from European competition for English clubs, with a 6-year ban on Liverpool. The long term consequences for English club football due to the actions of Liverpool fans at Heysel were arguably severe in terms of top level success, with English clubs initially struggling to make a significant impact in European competition upon their return from the ban." - A six year ban was 'arguably severe'?? 6 years for 39 deaths is severe? That's 8 weeks per life. Obviously some Scouse scum who wrote this (probably on a nicked computer). I vote we change the wording. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.213.240.1 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
European Cup?
"European Cup" should be "European Champion Clubs' Cup"
--RasMyn 06:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The whole article is very subjective and non-enclyopedic 86.140.17.231 (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Madjer.jpg
Image:Madjer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Bobpaisley1.jpg
The image File:Bobpaisley1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
what a shit article
far too much emotion - who the fcuk wrote this? Jonathon Pearce?