Jump to content

Talk:2010 in film

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk | contribs) at 21:14, 19 February 2010 (rm comment which is entirely in a foreign language). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconYears List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFilm List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mr. Nobody

I've added Mr. Nobody (film) to the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathslayer-97 (talkcontribs) 11:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Transformers 3D The Double Freeway"?

Why do people keep adding this bogus title? I've heard no actual news about it and every time someone reposts it they just copy Due Date or Megamind's sources and claim it as their own. 207.32.33.16 (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bolded

Why are some films bolded? 75.72.105.60 (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its a good question, the intention is to bold those that opened wide in the US, but there is already a symbol for that. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 01:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why the 2009 awards?

Why are the award ceremonies honoring 2009 films included in this article? Wouldn't the 2011 results (once they're out, of course) be more useful and relevant, since those nominees and winners reflect 2010 in film? Liquidlucktalk 06:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The award ceremonies happened in 2010, although I don't endorse them being here. They used to be just part of the event section, which made sense, but the table separate doesn't make sense. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 07:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]