Jump to content

Talk:Vyākaraṇa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Htahpoahf (talk | contribs) at 02:55, 23 February 2010 (Why??!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article title, merge, move, redirect??

Just thinking aloud. The merge proposal on Aindra school of grammar got me thinking. There are few problems with calling this article "Vyakarana". Vyakarana simply just translates to grammar and it is a tatsama in several languages other than Sanskrit. For example Kannada grammar is also called vyakarana. But the article about Kannada grammar(its still part of Kannada language I think) isnt called "vyakarana".

So, I was first tempted to just move this article to "Sanskrit grammar". But then Sanskrit grammar already exists. Also the scope of this article seems to be different from "Sanskrit grammar". Is Schools of Sanskrit grammar a better choice, then? Evidently, this article is not just about "Schools of Skt., grammar", though I feel it can be rewritten and moulded to fit such a title. Or can we cleanup Sanskrit grammar and make room for some of the contents from here. And the rest of the contents, we try to find place for somewhere else? Please add you thoughts. Sarvagnya 19:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oops.. i just realised that I had myself created Schools of Sanskrit grammar and that has a merge tag too. hmm.. let me think through this more. In the meanwhile, hope we can get some views in here. Sarvagnya 19:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, one of my points here is that, this article should have an English title to help define better the scope of the article. Sarvagnya 20:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why??!

...does Bhartrihari, the Sanskrit Grammarian's, page redirect here? Alinovic (talk) 13:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Daśāvatāra which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 16:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]