Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Bonella

Kathryn Bonella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. No sources other than own website which can not be used for notability. ~~Copyright issue with http://kathrynbonella.com with possible OTRS pending.~~ Stillwaterising (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note Bio page on website seems to have appropiate CC license. - Stillwaterising (talk) 23:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note Wikipedia entry has been updated with several media references supporting notability. - Gamblor72 (talk) 23:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Kathryn Bonella is a notable, published author and journalist. She has close ties to the infamous Schapelle Corby and Bali Nine cases. As co-author on Corby's autobiography, information about Bonella is relevant when examining the Corby case. In addition, her role in influence within the Australian media is substantial. - Gamblor72 (talk) 23:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC) In addition, Bonella satisfies WP:CREATIVE on all points. This is evidenced by the references cited in the article. - Gamblor72 (talk) 04:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be substituted.

Delete. The subject of the article does not meet the necessary criteria as described at WP:CREATIVE. There are no independent references to support the notability of Bonella. The article was created by the subject, or someone close to her. WWGB (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The article needs work, but some reliable Ghits aren't hard to find. By the way, Gamblor72, you don't have to keep saying "keep". Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you. I have added more references to the article to support notability. Gamblor72 (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Regardless of copyright issues, this article clearly violates a number of relevant Wikipedia policies related to misusing articles for advertising and spam. The person responsible for creating the article - no prizes for guessing who that probably is - ignores and deletes relevant comments on their talk page, showing an apparent contempt for engaging in any discussion process on these issues. Afterwriting (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you I am not Kathryn Bonella. I apologise for deleting the talk articles on my page - the issues they pertained to (copyright of original content) were resolved so they were deleted as no longer relevant. Gamblor72 (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note Bonella is not currently listed as a producer or associate producer for the American 60 Minutes program. Line-up is here. I would be interested in seeing documentation on this claim. - Stillwaterising (talk) 11:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be because she previously worked for 60 Minutes (Australian TV program) (see here), not the American version. WWGB (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article updated to reflect WWGB statement. Gamblor72 (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]