Talk:Allan Rock
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Health Minister
I removed this from the article:
"While health minister, Rock ignored deceit by Health Canada employees concerning work the department had done to protect Canadians with sensitivities from being killed in health care settings. As a result of this coverup, somewhere between a half-dozen and a few dozen Canadians with sensitivities are killed every day."
I don't know anything about these accusations, but if they are true and should be in the article, it needs to be re-written in a more neutral, encyclopedic tone. Liamdaly620 20:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
==
Someone is confusing the expression of a difficult and unflattering truth with an absence of neutrality. info@ages.ca
Broken link
The "official site" does not resolve.
Conversation with Marc Kelly
This event is hardly notable at the current time and including it with sole reference to the personal blog of Marc Kelly is hardly consistent with Wikipedia guidelines on biographies of living persons. 137.122.68.195 (talk) 23:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Page contributors - Objectivity questioned
Since 2008, the most frequent page editors have been identified as Denis G. Rancourt (denisgrancourt) and Marc Kelly (MarcKelly), both of whom have ongoing personal, academic, and professional conflicts with Allan Rock.
Their postings simply cannot be accepted as neutral. The section regarding the Kelly/Wolfe arrests has only a tenuous connection to the main article, despite Rancourt's excessive citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.103.137 (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
The content that I have contributed is accompanied by references using reliable sources, can be checked, and is objective and relevant to the sections where it was added. The references show that the content is newsworthy and reliable. The references show that Rock is directly implicated in the matters of Wolfe and Kelly. The same pattern is seen in the matter of Hickey. Denis.g.rancourt (talk) 02:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the "Objectivity questioned" tag. I agree that the information is relevant to the sections where it was added, and there are many sources referenced. The user MarcKelly does not currently have any posts on any part of this article. SeosamhH (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)