Jump to content

User talk:AnmaFinotera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 194.81.33.9 (talk) at 04:25, 25 March 2010 (I am the Rightful Lord of Wikipedia. Know your place.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Collectonian/talkheader

March 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at List of The Clique series characters. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Sandstein  08:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z9

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I'm reducing the block to time served, per below. I'll hunt down and remove the AB.

Request handled by:Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

See, generally, WP:NOTTHEM. Yes, Karunyan's conduct was disruptive, and I have blocked him for this for a longer time than you, but you have also edit-warred, even breaking 3RR. Each editor is responsible for their own actions; misconduct by others does not excuse misconduct by you. Sorry for the pronoun mistake, though.  Sandstein  09:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't see how dealing with this guy's second round of stalking is "edit warring" in any spirit of the rule. He was reverting to continue his previous disruptive behavior. It isn't technically vandalism, but it sure isn't productive editing either, and I would think common sense and IAR would apply in such a case. I also ceased reverting on Clique after I made my report so that administrators could deal with him. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 10:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is silly and petty. If the other editor is clearly being disruptive, stalking and making a nuisance of him/herself, then it's not really an edit war at all, but a case of common sense to deal with the disruptive user. This sort of thing is tedious and wastes a lot of time. Wikipeterproject (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree; Col should be immediately unblocked and the troll indef'ed. Cheers, Jack Merridew 19:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Col was clearly edit warring here, however, it's also pretty clear from the remarks before and after the block that she was being hounded by a bad faith editor who was tryin to get both of them blocked. Col was trying to get help with this, but couldn't get it in time. I would suggest that Col be unblocked for time served, and the other editor be indef blocked for obvious trolling. At the very least, he should be banned from harassing Col again when he returns. We've let a bad faith editor get a good editor blocked, here. Dayewalker (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's not edit waring when dealing with a troll, it's IAR. This troll was fed. Jack Merridew 20:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Collectonian is a good editor who got sucked into a trap. I think time served is good enough. As for Karunyan, I think he should be given one last sudden-death chance: if he begins the same thing when the current block ends, the block should become indefinite. We don't need disruptive editors here. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • For whatever reasons, Collectonian seems to be a perpetual target for trolls. Of course not every one of the 800+ active admins is necessarily aware of that, but I think some leeway should be granted to a user who puts up with so much trolling/stalking without completely losing her mind or retiring in disgust. I'm glad to see this block was lifted. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hear, hear. Defending the integrity of WP ought to be rewarded, not punished. Being bold can, at times, draw strong recation and, sometimes, being bold leads to making mistakes, but it is one of the fundamentals that makes WP work. The "Collectonians" of WP need our support and defense, even if they occasionally annoy us! Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me, I've debated the retiring in disgust, but I still love editing itself so still "hooked" so to speak :-) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all for the kind words and for supporting me in this situation. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post Block Notes

Done. Dandy Sephy (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :-) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Brat" update

Jimbo actually took a moment to write me from a flight he was on. Per his request, I've sent him the raw text of the LTA page and the e-mail address to file a formal complaint with AT&T/BellSouth/SBC Global. At least something may finally be done and I can unblock all those IP addresses when it is. Sorry to have read about that trolling incident. Just have faith that I have your back; you're too good an editor which is why the damned trolls target you. You let me know if you need anything. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear. Hope it happens soon. He just hit with another named sock, DJ Jam 2010 (talk · contribs) and seeking attention since he made sure to do his usual "hey here I am" stuff since his sock from yesterday, ScratteLover2 (talk · contribs) apparently went unnoticed. And thanks re the troll :-) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Working Woman's Barnstar
For your tireless work in fighting vandalism, promoting high standards of article quality, and improving media-related articles throughout Wikipedia. Largely because you've had a rough time of it recently and you should know that even those who disagree with you are impressed by the huge amount of often-thankless work you do around here. Consider this also an apology for adding to your stress at a time when you were under siege from less well-intentioned sources. DustFormsWords (talk) 10:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It is much appreciated. And I apologize if I ended up venting some of that stress on you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

InuYasha The Final Act episode dates

Hey I fixed the dates cuz some had the English airing the day before the Japanese and some had it on the same day as the Japanese which doesn't make sense. Hope this is ok. If you want to change anything please feel free to do so.

~Garfield Turtle Anime~ (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Hajiru[reply]

I have reverted your change. The dates are correct per the reliable sources cited. It might seem off, but apparently sometimes the Japanese episode was delayed, for whatever reason, but Viz went ahead and released its English one, and sometimes it released it early. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Oh ok that makes sense. Thanks Collectonian, for the help. ^^

~Garfield Turtle Anime~ (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Hajiru[reply]

Hey

Hi Collectonian, I feel so guilty for not being on here as much as I should. I miss this website. I was just wondering how you're doing. :) Right now I'm trying to revamp the article for Barefoot Gen. :D – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 18:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No reason to feel guilty. Having a life is a good thing ;-) My editing is down some as well. Mostly okay, despite recent events. Good article to work on. :-) I just found two more novel articles I need to work on. I can't believe such classics as White Fang and Call of the Wild have such horrible articles. :-( -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's unbelievable. Sometimes I think people get too caught up in working on obscure little series. I mean really? Twin Spica has an amazing article while Speed Racer and Astro Boy have utter crap? :P Hell, I haven't even heard of Twin Spica...and as it appears it was published in Comic Flapper; a very loner manga anthology. But I totally agree, Call of the Wild and White Fang should have better articles. Call of the Wild is one of the greats. – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 01:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have noticed that too. Some really obscured, unlicensed series will have lengthy pages, while very popular ones have next to nothing. I'm planning to fix White Fang and Call of the Wild, at some point and presuming I don't just walk away from this place after this latest block. *isgh* Probably won't, though...I do still love writing and editing and there are no other such outlets to turn to. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd hate to see you leave, Collectonian, it'd end up being too quiet around here... =) Maybe what you really need, though, is a wikibreak? --Dinoguy1000 (talk · contribs) as 66.116.30.195 (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(Hey Dinoguy!) Me too. That would be sad. :( Don't go Lassie...don't go.... – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 18:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Darn tootin' you shouldn't go ... if you give up, the trolls win, including a certain little BRAT who would probably love to see his long-time nemesis bail. And the last thing I'm sure you want to see is the little cretin win. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bambifan I'm guessing.... – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 20:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome. Cheers, Cattus talk 20:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at List of InuYasha characters. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

How are two reverts edit warring, especially 8 days after the last edits? This is a pretty weak block, especially given the prior circumstances.Dandy Sephy (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|What the heck?? See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Karunyan Continuing Wikihounding/Trolling After 72 hour block and see above. I reported this issue of Karunyan‎ continuing his trolling and harassment after the last block to ANI and two admins. This is crazy! Ask for help and you get blocked? Thanks for making this guy's day, again. I bet he is seriously laughing in trollville now. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Unblocked. If nothing else, it's pretty obvious that you can't violate 3RR with only one revert.

Request handled by: Smashvilletalk

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thanks...still autoblocked though. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixedxenotalk 19:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This whole thing reeks to me. Karunyan has been doing nothing but wikistalking and hounding since the InuYasha character list revert, and has been given more than enough chances to correct his behavior. Meanwhile, Collectonian exhibited more self-control here than she usually does (probably because she was already blocked once over the matter for 3RR), reverting only twice. What is needed is not another block on a valuable contributor, but an indef on the troll. --Dinoguy1000 (talk · contribs) as 67.58.229.153 (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. See prior thread, where the troll was not indef'd. Unblock Collectonian and indef the troll. Jack Merridew 17:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That just makes me sick. – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 18:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
i also agree, i just checked the List of InuYasha characters, from what i see, it was the other user, Karunyan who was doing the trolling. Collectonian gave clear reason while the other simply didn't. I'm probably not helping at all...sorry if I'm disruptingBread Ninja (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A goose for Collectonian, the village stocks for Karunyan. – allennames 02:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Son Goku's Voice Actors

Hello, I was told by User:Sesshomaru to ask you about this. On Son Goku's page, there is a list of English and Japanese voices actors. I recently discovered the identity of Goku's English voice actor in an old English dub of Dragon Ball Z. Before FUNimation dubbed DBZ, and after Harmony Gold's whopping five episodes of Dragon Ball, Creative Products Corporation (in association with Animation International) produced an English version of DBZ in the Phillipines somewhere around 1993. They also dubbed Dragon Ball and the two Coola movies. It being an official English dub, and this being an English language page, it makes sence to include it. It's far more known than Harmony Gold's dub. Look on YouTube (or anywhere) and you'd find clips of it, but no such clips even exist for Harmony Gold's dub.Linkdude20002001 (talk) 01:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This question would be better asked at the Anime/Manga project. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collectonian is the most dangerous vandal on Wikipedia

Made more so by the fact that she presents a pitiful mask of self-righteousness which fools the feeble-minded. If there were any justice in the world, she would be blocked like any other laughable everyman but the fact remains that Jimbo Wales is a weak-minded political puppet, under the control of the bootlickers that comprise the so called Board of Trustees who live in luxury, while leaving Wikipedia to the so-called government of vandals such as court jesters like Collectonian. --194.81.33.9 (talk) 04:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]