Leah Ward Sears

Leah Ward Sears
File:Sears2.jpg
Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court
In office June 28, 2005 – June 30, 2009
Appointed by	Zell Miller
Preceded by	Norman S. Fletcher
Succeeded by	Carol Hunstein
Personal details
Spouse	Haskell Ward
Alma mater	Cornell University Emory University School of Law University of Virginia School of Law

Leah Ward Sears (born June 13, 1955) is an American jurist and former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the U.S. state of Georgia. Sears was the first African-American female Chief Justice in the United States. When she was first appointed as justice in 1992 by then-Governor Zell Miller, she became the first woman and youngest person to sit on the Supreme Court of Georgia.

Early life and education

Leah Ward Sears was born in Heidelberg, Germany to United States Army Colonel Thomas E. Sears and Onnye Jean Sears. The family eventually settled in Savannah, Georgia, where she attended and graduated from high school.

Sears received a Bachelor of Science from Cornell University in 1976, her Juris Doctor from Emory University School of Law in 1980, and a Master of Laws from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1995. At Cornell, Sears was a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated and the Quill and Dagger society. She holds honorary degrees from Morehouse College, Clark-Atlanta University, LaGrange College, Piedmont College, and Spelman College.

Professional career

After graduating from law school, Sears was an attorney from 1980 until 1985 with the Atlanta law firm Alston & Bird. For many years she was also an Adjunct Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law.

Judicial career

Sears was appointed by then-Mayor Andrew Young to the City of Atlanta Traffic Court in 1985. She then became a Superior Court judge in 1988 (the first African-American woman to hold that position in the state). She became a state Supreme Court justice in 1992.

Although historically a non-partisan election, the Georgia Republican Party and Georgia Christian Coalition targeted Sears for defeat in 2004. She defeated her challenger with 62 percent of the vote.

Sears announced in October 2008 that she would resign from the state Supreme Court at the end of June 2009 when her term as Chief Justice ended.

Consideration as a law school dean

Sears was named in January 2009 as one of five finalists to become dean of the University of Maryland School of Law. However, in February 2009, Sears withdrew her name from consideration, in order to pursue other opportunities.

Possible nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court

Sears is considered a potential future U.S. Supreme Court nominee by President Barack Obama to become a Supreme Court Justice.

Return to private legal practice

On May 13, 2009, Sears announced that she will join the Atlanta offices of the large law firm Schiff Hardin, despite being thought to be in consideration for a U.S. Supreme Court vacancy. Sears will work on a half-time basis for the first year, with a particular interest in the firm's appellate work and white-collar crime work. "I'm going full steam ahead," Sears told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

After leaving the court, Sears announced that she would teach a course in family law at the University of Georgia Law School and had accepted a fellowship at the Institute of American Values.

Personal

Sears currently lives in Atlanta, Georgia with her husband Haskell Ward(who doesn't have his own WP page, poor Haskell), former Deputy Mayor of New York City under Mayor Ed Koch. She is the mother of Addison Sears-Collins and Brennan Sears-Collins. Sears and her first husband, Love Collins III, divorced in 1994.

Sears is friends with Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, due to their home towns in southeastern Georgia.

Notable Decisions

First Amendment

• Sears wrote a dissent in the case of Howard v. State (2000). The majority of the court rejected challenges based on right-to-privacy and first amendment considerations to a Georgia statute that criminalized the solicitation of sodomy. In her dissent, Justice Sears stated that she would have found the statute unconstitutional because it prohibited solicitation of legal (consensual; non-paid for) sodomy. Justice Sears saw this as a “content-based” speech restriction that could have no legitimate purpose because sodomy itself is legal.

• Sears wrote a dissent in the case of Club Southern Burlesque v. City of Carrollton (1995). The majority concluded that an ordinance placing various restrictions and limitations on strip clubs did not violate the First Amendment because the restrictions were “content-neutral” and the ordinance furthered important government interests unrelated to speech—for example, pernicious secondary effects as documented in studies commissioned by other municipalities. Justice Sears dissented, arguing that City cannot simply reference other cities’ studies to establish its important governmental interest.

Fourth Amendment

• In Fox v. State (2000), Justice Sears held that the warrantless search of a probationer’s house by a police officer (as opposed to a probation officer) is unconstitutional.

• Sears wrote a dissent in the case of Reaves v. State (2008). The case involved the legitimacy of a warrant that authorized a search for evidence of murder and cruelty to children. Chief Justice Sears argued that the words “notes” and “papers”, which were listed on the warrant as specific items that could be sought under its terms, "lacked sufficient detail to satisfy the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment."

• Sears wrote a dissent in LaFontaine v. State (1998). Justice Sears would have held an alcohol-check roadblock an unconstitutional search/seizure because, in her view, the particular roadblock allowed individual officers too much discretion -- “field officers had the discretion to control the time, the place, and the duration of the road block.” At the same time that she argued on the grounds that officers were given too much discretion, she noted that the officers in the case were required by supervisors’ policy to stop every car when they put the road block into effect.

• Sears concurred with the majority in Franks v. State (1997). When a suspect was booked, the booking officer asked him how he got a bloody wound that the booking officer observed. Majority concluded this question amounted to the illicit practice of "custodial interrogation" and said that no exception from rules governing custodial interrogation can be made for medical questions like this at booking. Sears concluded that booking officer can ask medical questions designed to determine if suspect needs medical attention, but that this question was too broad for any “medical question” exception.

Sixth Amendment

• Sears dissented from the Gibson v. Turpin (1999). The majority held that, as with non-death cases, there is no federal or state constitutional right to state-appointed and funded counsel for habeas corpus proceedings for murderers sentenced to death. Justice Sears would have found that such a right to appointed counsel exists for habeas proceedings for capital defendants. Justice Sears stated: “The official taking of a human life is the ultimate government exercise of control and power over individual liberty. If it is to be done, it must be done cautiously, dispassionately, soberly, and fairly. And fundamental fairness demands that a condemned prisoner have the benefit of competent counsel [on habeas].”

Eighth Amendment

• Sears dissented from the majority's opinion in State v. Davis (2008). The Georgia Supreme Court denied (4-3) the second habeas petition filed by a convicted cop-killer. The habeas petition was based on affidavits of supposed witness recantations. In her dissent, Chief Justice Sears acknowledged procedural bars to considering these affidavits but advocated loosening procedural bars where there are claims of innocence in death penalty cases. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari.

• In Wilson v. State (2007) Chief Justice Sears held that the Eighth Amendment precluded a ten-year prison sentence for a teenager convicted of child molestation based on act of oral sodomy.

• Sears dissented from the majority opinion in the case of Wilson v. State(1999). Justice Sears argued that death by electrocution is unconstitutional and inconsistent with evolving standards of decency. Alternatively, she would have held the decision until the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue in a case it was then considering.

• Justice Sears dissented from every death-by-electrocution decision until a majority of the Georgia Supreme Court declared it violated the Georgia Constitution in 2001. Dawson v. State, 274 Ga. 327 (2001) (concurring). Justice Sears agreed with the majority and held that death by electric chair violates the Georgia constitution.

Due Process

• Sears dissented from the majority's opinion in Hill v. Head (2003). Justice Sears would have struck down on due process grounds a Georgia law requiring murderers sentenced to death to prove mental retardation beyond a reasonable doubt (in order to escape the death penalty). Justice Sears argued that due process, pursuant to the 14th Amendment, requires that the burden of proof on the murderer be no more than a preponderance of the evidence.

• Sears dissented from the majority's opinion in Lumpkin v. Johnson (1998). Justice Sears argued to overturn a murder conviction after concluding that the system by which cases are assigned to trial judges is impermissible.

• Sears dissented from the majority's opinion in McIntyre v. State (1995). Justice Sears argued that the defendant’s murder conviction should have been overturned because a judge was substituted in the middle of trial.

• Sears concurred with the majority in Powell v. State (1998). The majority concluded that Georgia sodomy statute that criminalized “private, unforced, non-commercial acts of sexual intimacy between persons legally able to consent” infringed on the “right to privacy” implied in the Georgia constitution. Justice Sears concurred to discuss the responsibility of courts to protect constitutional rights against morals legislation from the majority.

General criminal matters

• Sears dissented from the majority opinion in Morrison v. State (2006) Chief Justice Sears would have reversed conviction of person for drugs and firearms offenses because the State failed to comply with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. As the Chief Justice recognized, however, the vast majority of State courts have upheld convictions where the IAD is not literally followed.

Government accountability

• Phillips v. Hanse (2006)

Taxation

• Johnstone v. Thompson (2006) In contrast to the majority, which held that using tax dollars collected from a special purpose tax that did not include providing all middle and high school students with laptops, Justice Sears argued in her dissent, along with Justice Melton, that allocating tax proceeds for laptops was not an abuse of discretion.

Election law

• O'Kelley v. Cox (2004). In contrast to the majority, which held that citizens have no right to invoke the power of the judiciary to enjoin the enactment of a proposed constitutional amendment because the judiciary is vested with the power to determine the constitutionality of legislation, not the constitutionality of resolutions still in the legislative process of enactment. Sears argued in her dissent, along with Justice Benham, that the judiciary has the power to enjoin the proposed amendment because the Georgia constitution prohibits ballot measures that amend the Georgia Constitution in multiple ways under the single subject rule.

SCOTUS reviews

• State v. Davis (2008). The Georgia Supreme Court denied (4-3) the second habeas petition filed by a convicted cop-killer based on affidavits of supposed witness recantations. In her dissent, Chief Justice Sears acknowledged procedural bars to considering these affidavits but advocated loosening procedural bars where there are claims of innocence in death penalty cases. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari.

• State v. Randolph (2004). Justice Sears joined a 4-3 majority that found that the consent of one resident to search common spaces is not effective when the other resident is present and explicitly refuses consent. The United States Supreme Court affirmed the state Supreme Court majority.

• Greene v. State (1996). Justice Sears dissented in this capital case. She argued that the dismissal of several jurors who had “qualms” about the death penalty was incorrect. The United States Supreme Court unanimously agreed with Justice Sears and reversed, holding the majority applied an incorrect legal standard for juror dismissals.

• Reich v. Collins, 1992 and 1993. The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that a state taxpayer could not get a refund for taxes he paid under a valid state tax law that was later invalidated by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court remanded in light of a recently-decided case requiring such a refund unless the state had a clear and exclusive pre-deprivation procedure for contesting taxes. The Georgia Supreme Court again denied a refund, arguing it had such a scheme. Justice Sears joined a dissent that would have provided a refund. The Supreme Court reversed, saying Georgia’s pre-deprivation scheme was not clearly exclusive, and thus taxpayer must be allowed to pursue a refund action. [See 513 U.S. 106 (1994).]

Georgia Supreme Court review of Sears

During the time that Sears sat as a Superior Court judge, eleven cases in which she rendered a verdict were ultimately reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court. In three of the eleven cases (or 27% of the time), Sears was reversed.

• Wright v. Robinson (1993). Superior Court Judge Sears had concluded that a medical malpractice claimant can voluntarily dismiss a claim and refile it within six months, even when the later filed claim is untimely. The state Supreme Court reversed.

• Robinson v. State (1991). The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that Superior Court Judge Sears erred by failing to give a “circumstantial evidence” instruction in a case where there was direct evidence of crime, but witness supplying direct evidence had been impeached.

2004 election campaign

In 2004, Justice Sears ran for re-election against challenger Grant Brantley. During the election campaign, Sears was characterized by conservative opponents as an activist judge.

Her campaign raised $553,666 and has spent $264,535.

• Sears: 745,011, or 62.3%
• Brantley: 451,320, or 37.7%

The Sears-Brantley election contest was the first in the state to be conducted under rules that allow opposing candidates to discuss legal issues and each other's records. Until 2004, a restriction existed that forbade discussion of candidates' records or other issues. George Weaver, who tried unsuccessfully to unseat Sears in 1998, brought a successful lawsuit to end that restriction.

Career History, Organization Memberships and Awards

Career History

• Alston & Bird Attorneys at Law, Atlanta, GA, lawyer, 1980-1985
• City Court of Atlanta, traffic court judge, 1985-1987
• Fulton Superior Court, Atlanta, judge, 1988-1992
• State Supreme Court of Georgia, justice, 1992-2009
• Founder of Battered Women's Project of Columbus, GA

Organization Membership

• National Association of Women's Judges
• Georgia Association of Black Women Attorneys(founding president)
• Chair, Chief Justice's Commission on Professionalism
• Chair, Supreme Court Commission on Civil Justice
• Chair, Supreme Court's Commission on Marriage, Children and Families
• Georgia Tech Advisory Board
• Links, Incorporated
• Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

Awards

• NAACP award for community service
• 2006 Trumpet Award-Law
• 2008 Honoree--Second Annual Wayne A. McCoy Memorial Historymaker's Program
• 2007-2009 Rosalynn Carter Fellow in Public Policy
• Leadership Atlanta

See also

• Barack Obama Supreme Court candidates
• Troy Davis case

External links

• The HistoryMakers profile
• Georgia Trend magazine feature