Talk:ROFLCon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ROFLCon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Internet culture Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Problem: the current "External Links" section is actually the references
Now I'm pretty sure that ain't right. I'd just move them elsewhere but that'd leave them as orphan references that weren't referred to by the article text (I skimmed WP:CITE and I don't think that's good either). So later I think I'll try to work them into the article text.
Here's my plan; please comment if you have different ideas. Most of the links are to blogs, though they're ones run by prominent, established sources. So I'm imagining a paragraph of "it was covered by the tech blogs of several major news outlets."
Also: I found a non-blog ref in some NPR coverage here and here. And yes, this whole section is mainly for my later use but I thought I'd do this in the open in case anyone wants to comment. --Qwerty0 (talk) 06:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
ROFLCON on YewTewb
It looks quite stupid Tempmusic (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)