Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open AT OS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.207.236.42 (talk) at 18:25, 27 April 2010 (→‎Open AT OS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Open AT OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested CSD-G11. Two editor and IP commented that it appeared to be "spammy" or an ad in edit summaries or talk page. Not notable software, no verifiable or reliable sources listed, all appear to be self-published. GNews shows what appear to be press releases, but no other coverage. IP contesting CSD stated on talk page that there are few to no sources for the software, and that it needs to be here to get the information out. GregJackP (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Editor and the above user feel that the article is "spammy", its a very notable OS if your in the very small field of people working with micro-controllers and GSM modems. As I said before this is not MS Windows, your not going to find much on this OS other than the data from the vendor, but it is widely used in GPS and Asset Tracking hardware- as such its a great note on the history and evolution of this OS.. I will work to edit the article because to be honest this is the one place with all that data delivered in such a clean manner- I already pulled the adish wording out, contrary to GregJackP- I still dispute putting something as harsh as the CSD G11 Tag on the article.

Just because you dont know what the article is about, and you dont work in embedded electronics- does not mean its not noteworthy. Please see the article discussion page for more info- give this thing a chance, its not that hard to clean up... in fact I think I have already cleaned most of the ad-like stuff, but not being a professional wiki-writer I cannot fully judge the neutrality of the article, I can tell you it does not read like an AD at this point.

64.207.236.42 (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]