User talk:Moogleluvr
Better late than never; Welcome!
Welcome!
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:
Best of luck to you, and happy editing! |
your recent edits
Interesting after about 1 edit in 2.5 years you return just to edit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop . LibStar (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- As a user of Wikipedia, I believe I've maintained the right to contribute to the discussion of a topic that I have interest in, would you not agree? Or is my very user-ship questionable as well? Moogleluvr (talk) 05:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- just curious that you come back to participate in one AfD and nothing else that has been subject to blatant canvassing. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- Here I must call into question the definition and the purpose of the label "canvassing". If Wikipedia relies upon the quality of arguments versus the quantity of arguments made in the favor of keeping/deleting an article, then a mass of recruited sheeple should have no effect on the quality of the discussion, by merit of the fact that they contribute little to the discussion.
- As well, by the same token, if Wikipedia welcomes all to contribute their points to the discussion, then I see little difference between a well-argued point drawn from recruitment/"canvassing", and from one who stumbles upon the discussion. In fact, a recruited contributor to the debate may very well have better, more well-versed points to contribute to the discussion than a random contributor due to their involvement in said subject. Moogleluvr (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)