User talk:Bokpasa

List of rulers of Morocco

I believe that the rulers of Morocco page should include all dynasties that have ruled Morocco or who historians have judges ruled Morocco. All I was doing was reverting the deletion of a huge segment of the page that made it look like there were no rulers in Morocco before the seventeenth century. I would abide by any concensus against this but looking at the talk page Talk:List of rulers of Morocco there appears to be a concensus that this information should remain. Davewild 16:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Batallaelsalado.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Batallaelsalado.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 12:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Idrisid Map

What exactly is wrong with the Idrisid map? I saw your comment on the map's page. What needs to be corrected?Rcduggan (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, those are errors, that should probably be corrected. Possibly in the future you could post those on the map's talk page too, so people could see them. Rcduggan (talk) 13:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Idrisids Dynasty 788-985.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Idrisids Dynasty 788-985.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

Unless content that you are adding is common knowledge, you should add references (see WP:REF for how and WP:V for why). This is especially true if the information you are adding is obscure or contentious. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on History of Morocco

Please stop I am posting the same message on User talk:Bokpasa and User talk:Omar-Toons. You both need to stop edit-warring and accusing one another of vandalism. If you need a third party to mediate, I suggest that you read WP:MEDIATE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:27, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Hello,

I reported your revertings to the Edit Warring noticeboard: [1].

You know that you are banned on the French and Spanish sections because of that, I hope you will stop editing articles using your POV instead of sources and links, as you just did [2]

Omar-Toons (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Morocco

Your edit Your edit to this page is ungrammatical and appears to be either a POV edit or silly nonsense vandalism. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Morocco

Hi Bokpasa, this is not the Spanish Wikipedia. Therefore, the "official" language is English and not Spanish. Can you please write in English, stop editting as an anonymous editor and posting your comments in the talk page of the aforementioned article? Thanks --Ecemaml (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No puedo escribir en español porque ayudaste a que me expulsaran de la española, y te escribo en español para que no haya malentendidos y luego ya se sabe lo que pasa... Además pones que sabes español así que bueno ya sabes, o si quieres te lo traduzco al inglés pero tienes que aceptar mis errores (cosas que a Omar si le aceptas jejej). Por cierto si hubieses leido lo que he puedo he puesto no editaría en 2 días....Bokpasa 14:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't think you understand what's going on. This is not a conversation between you and me. You've talking about an article editions in the English Wikipedia. Therefore you must a) write in English; b) do it in the proper place. That is, the article talk page. As said there, your English language abilities are poor, your editions meaningless most of the times, your style quite far away of the encyclopaedic prose, your sources are not reliable (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources) and furthermore, you've on the verge of breaking WP:3RR many times (in fact you've already done many times). Thus, it's up to you to contribute in a constructive way or returning to projects with lack of policies (and lack of community, or both). --Ecemaml (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Don't refactor EVER my comments in a talk page. Hope it's clear --Ecemaml (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a clue of the discussion level you wish to enforce, I don't think going on with the discussion is worthy. --Ecemaml (talk) 08:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]