Proletarianization

Template:Marxist theory Proletarianization is a concept in Marxism and Marxist sociology. It refers to the social process whereby people move from being either an employer, unemployed or self-employed, to being employed as wage labor by an employer. In Marxist theory, proletarianisation is often seen as the most important form of downward social mobility. However this is not necessarily the case, since people who previously performed no wage labour can raise their living standard and income by becoming a salaried employee.

Marx's concept

For Marx, the process of proletarianization was the other side of capital accumulation. The growth of capital meant the growth of the working class. The expansion of capitalist markets involved processes of primitive accumulation and privatisation, which transferred more and more assets into capitalist private property, and concentrated wealth in fewer and fewer hands. Therefore, an increasing mass of the population was reduced to dependence on wage labour for income, i.e. they had to sell their labour power to an employer for a wage or salary because they lacked assets or other sources of income. The materially-based contradictions within capitalist society would foster revolution. Marx believed the proletariat would eventually overthrow the bourgeoisie as the 'last class in history'.

In modern capitalism

The classic historical study of proletarianization is E.P. Thompson's The Making of the English Working Class (1963), in which the author portrays the meanings, struggles and conditions of an emerging proletariat.

Many intellectuals have described proletarianization in advanced capitalism as "the extension of the logic of factory labor to a large sector of services and intellectual professions."^[1]

In most countries, entitlement to unemployment benefits is conditional on actively looking for work, and that means people, assuming they are not sick, are compelled to seek employment either as salaried worker or as self-employed worker.

Geographically and historically, the process of proletarianization is closely associated to urbanization because it has often involved the migration of people from rural areas where they engaged in subsistence farming, family farming and share-cropping to the cities and towns, in search of waged work and income in an office or factory (see rural flight).^{[citation needed]}

Criticism of the concept

Non-Marxist sociologists will often admit that the development of the capitalist mode of production has caused a huge increase of the number of wage and salary earners within the world's working population. But they argue that:

this fact does not necessarily mean or imply proletarianization. For example, the new middle classes (professionals, managers etc.) also earn salaries, but these salaries are sufficiently high to permit a lifestyle and asset ownership which cannot be called "proletarian" anymore.

if we only look at wages and salaries earnt, we might come to wrong conclusions. We also have to take into account asset ownership and household wealth; non-wage income can be a large component of personal income, and households may obtain income from various different sources, of which money-wages are only one.

proletarianization is not a process uniquely associated with capitalism. For example, a proletarian element existed also in the Roman empire and in feudal Europe, and more importantly, hundreds of millions of peasants in the USSR and China were "proletarianized", not as a result of capitalist private enterprise, but as a result of state directives and policies.

References

^ Debord, Guy (1967) The Society of the Spectacle, chap.14 thesis 114

External links

Workers under neocapitalism

[1] Debord, Guy (1967) The Society of the Spectacle, chap.14 thesis 114

[1]