Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical

Reviewer (add request)

Archived approved requests:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

Declined:
1

Shortcut

WP:PERM/RW

User:Mwinog2777

Mwinog2777 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am a Wikipedian with >2000 edits and I feel I have much to offer as an editor. I have many areas of interest as seen by my edits.Mwinog2777 (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Mwinog2777 (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:MZMcBride

MZMcBride · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Consulted user before adding. No reason not to... unless he doesn't want it. Jclemens (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User has over 65,000 contributions and would be trusted with it (his edits won't need to be reviewed). ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 03:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Astonmartini

Astonmartini · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Astonmartini (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a registered Wikipedian for about 5 years now and have been a fairly consistent editor during that time. My wide ranging interests and countless hours spent on this website mean that I will easily be able to scour the site for vandalism which I shall promptly rectify. Cheers Astonmartini (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tigerhawkvok

Tigerhawkvok · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I've been on Wikipedia for about 4.5 years now, and (though not always logged in when I do so), routinely will correct the sort of vandalism that a reviewer would check for. I don't blindly go in and edit everything, and some of my edits may be pedantic, but I wholly support the most reliable and utterly accurate Wikipedia possible. Tigerhawkvok (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]