Jump to content

Talk:Historical accuracy of Gladiator (2000 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.92.79.239 (talk) at 21:53, 11 July 2010 (Discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: British Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
Note icon
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Discussion

This is not an article but a list of bullets!--75.30.178.197 (talk) 07:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"In the movie, the Colosseum is referred to by that name", they should say the Flavian Ampitheatre. Well, in the film all of the Roman characters speak English instead of Latin! Hardly any of the words they use would be immediately familiar to people from times of the Roman Empire.

This is a good idea for an article but it's poorly executed.Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it just so happens that many words that proper nouns usually exist in similar pronunciation regardless of the language used. Flavian Amphitheater would be one of these.--Jorfer (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will admit that "Flavian Ampitheatre" sounds much more like Ampitheatrum Flavium than "Colosseum" does. The Latin version of the name wasn't included in the article when I commented on it before.--Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is at least one example i can think of off the top of my head where a Roman army used ballistae against enemy soldiers..... in a forest.... in Germany. It's at Kalefeld, where a Roman army was ambushed by germans c 200 CE (AD). theres dozens of bolts embedded in the hillside where the German ambushers are assumed to have been attacking from. the smaller scorpions and such were mobile for a reason. onagers not so much, so perhaps that part's correct

also theres several battles attested to by ancient authors where the legions were charged by enemy armies so fast that they didn't have time to throw their pila. so again, that is within the realm of the believable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.53.168 (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bulleted point about gladiatorial combats being rarely fatal is totally at odds with the encyclopedia entry on Gladiators, which indicates the spectacles were very bloody, violent, and death-filled.

References needed

This article badly needs additional references. As it is, it seems to be mostly made up of original research. Robofish (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]