Jump to content

User talk:74.194.176.82

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.194.176.82 (talk) at 21:13, 23 August 2010 (→‎I did NOT break the three revert rule). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, 74.194.176.82! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 21:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

August 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greece national basketball team. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 20:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did NOT break the three revert rule

I did NOT make 3 reverts in 24 hours, nor more than that. Yellow Evan has made 3 in 24 hours and obviously false reported me, after I warned him about it. Please review that and restore the edit as I last made it, and remove my warning, and the false threat to ban me. Otherwise I will take it up with other mods. Thank you.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not restore your edit. Please direct your attention to the talkpage first, and then I may seriously consider it. It is not a "false threat" or whatever you make it out to be. Note how I said "appear" rather than is. And edit warring is different from 3RR. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 20:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yellow Evan is the one that is edit warring, not me. You need to actually check who is causing the problem before you make a threat to ban someone.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I never reported you. BTW, it reverted two times in 24 hours. I carefully checked that. I am just reverting it because it is WP:OR. It will be kept if a source is provided. Also, I tired to discuss on the talk page, but no one was answered. YE Tropical Cyclone 20:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Someone reported me and you are the only person that could have done it. If you did it off site with a buddy of yours then you broke site rules. Also, I did not make more than 3 reverts. And as soon as you would have been breaking that rule you had this other guy revert it back. I have not even broken the rule and am being told I cannot restore it back. You are the one that started the edit warring by removing things from the page and falsely claiming original research. You reported me, and then you lied about reporting me just now.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please calm down. More of this paranoia may (notice how I said "may") get you blocked. It is not a threat; I simply do not wish for you to be blocked. It takes two to edit war, by the way. Please read the essay on edit warring, and notice how it is much different from breaking 3RR. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 20:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am not paranoid. You had no reason to threaten to ban me unless someone reported me. I am taking this up with other mods. Good day sir.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And I checked, Yellow Evan received no warning for edit warring and he is the one that caused it and he is the one that actually did it. Not me.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)Dont worry nobody reported you. You will not be banned. However, you could be blocked for only 24 hours. We are not reporting you. YE Tropical Cyclone 20:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you caused it by reverting the edit. also, I reverted tow times during 24 hour. No offense, but learn how to count. YE Tropical Cyclone 20:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the user rights of both of you. And now you threaten the implication of a 24 hour block. I am putting this on the admin notice board. You can explain it to them. Thank you.74.194.176.82 (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, it their is no Wikipedia policy for acting like an admin and not being one. Your AN is not gonna go anywhere. Sorry. YE Tropical Cyclone
Please do not discuss this anymore. The admins will handle it.74.194.176.82 (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There I warned him. But you also participated in the edit war, therefore you are equally to be warned. You satisfied? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are acting like you are an admin. According to the check user feature you are not. Please do not discuss this further until I get an explanation from an actual admin, and not a pretend one. If the check user feature is in error then someone can explain that also.74.194.176.82 (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]