User talk:Josh hage

Welcome!

Hello, Josh hage, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lachlan Collins, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Clubmarx (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lachlan Collins

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lachlan Collins, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glenunga, South Australia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clubmarx (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Rubin Carter worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Clubmarx (talk) 02:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lachlan Collins

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drake Dawson (talk) 03:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Roscoe Thomson

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Roscoe Thomson. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Salih (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Isobel Redmond. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 02:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TeaDrinker (talk) 03:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TeaDrinker (talk) 03:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I FIND IT RUDE OF YOU TO BLOCK ME!!!!!!!

REASONS TO UNBLOCK ME

FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!!!111!!1!!!!!!1!!1!!!!!1!!111!!!!! I NEED WIKIPEDIA IN MY LIFE!!!!!

I PROMISE TO USE WIKIPEDIA TO EDUCATE OTHERS BETTER NEXT TIME :(

To be clear, you have no freedom to vandalize; editing Wikipedia is not a right. If you promise not to ever vandalize or disrupt Wikipedia, I would be happy to unblock you. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine i agree not to vadalise, BUT some of those articles i edited were not vadilism but removing content which was incorrect!!!