User talk:Tide rolls

To Leave a New Message
Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you.

I prefer to maintain the continuity of threads by keeping them in a single location when possible.
If you post a message here I will reply here and leave a {{Talkback|Tide rolls}} template on your talk page so that you do not have to watch this page. If you wish me to reply on your talk page, post the message on your talk page and leave a {{Talkback|your username}} template here. Thanks for your cooperation.

Template:Archive box collapsible

re: M Night graph

Hey there, I'm actually not sure how messages work, but I'll give this a go. I didn't revert an edit, I simply re-added it, I wouldn't say I am proficient in Wikipedia by any stretch. Anyway, I still don't feel IMDB is an invalid site. Movie reviews are a subjective rating, whether they come from people who get paid (critics) or people in general. However, as we know, a collection of people in general are not necessarily bad; just look at wikipedia!

I could use rotten tomatoes, (which uses real critic reviews) if you would like, but I don't see the difference. How else can I present ratings of his movie, if not by subjective ratings?

Thanks, Jeffrotman (talk) 16:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, when you re-added the image you reverted the edit that removed the image. Furthermore, your edit summary stated " Not sure why this was deleted ". The editor that removed the image stated in their edit summary that reviewers should " see talk ". This is shorthand for look at the article's discussion page for explanation. User:SummerPhD did not alledge that IMDB was an "invalid" site, they explained how IMDB's information is not always verifiable. Movie reviews are indeed subjective; that is why Wikipedia has a notability guideline found at WP:Notability. As far as presenting ratings, you might ask editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films. I would advise that you also read this essay: WP:BRD. It explains the editing cycle ideally and will give you many pointers on how to engage other editors in discussion. If you have any more questions, let me know. Thanks Tiderolls 23:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About vandalism

Every user sometimes make mistakes by reverting edits that is not vandalism. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've done that myself. Tiderolls 23:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know because it's on your talk page saying that you make mistakes and that you're human. We are all human expect for the bots. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About 15 years ago...

This movie made me wished I had joined the Navy instead of the Air Force... incidentally, when you became a Sysop here, that ringtone (@2:07) just pops into my head again. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 16:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I enjoyed the movie also. Imagine my disappointment when I did not see Bear Bryant listed in the cast of characters... Tiderolls 18:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block 65.34.149.110

Can you block 65.34.149.110 because of vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 17:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously disruptive. Done. Tiderolls 17:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wayne Olajuwon chat 17:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For reverting a lot of vandalism you deserve a cookie!

Wayne Olajuwon has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Wayne Olajuwon chat 17:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies are good...many thanks. Tiderolls 17:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! Wayne Olajuwon chat 17:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jake McGee

How is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Renner

Any different than this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Leonard_McGee

I'm asking in seriousness; I want to get McGee's page to stay here, so if I need to chop down some things, please let me know what I should. I've been a fan of his for years, and am not sure how McGee can't get a page on Wikipedia.

[[[User:Erosinski|Erosinski]] (talk) 18:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Ernesto RosinskiErosinski (talk)][reply]