Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historicist

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spaceclerk (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 28 November 2010 (→‎Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Historicist

Historicist (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.


28 November 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Account created the same day as Historicist was blocked, this account is agenda-driven with the same interest in the Holocaust, deniers and antisemitism. User portrayed immediately experienced edits and policy understanding and yet denies any previous accounts or blocks. I brought this up at the last blocking admins MastCells talkpage here. They also added another possible account sockmastermaster as User:NoCal100. Checkuser required to check for additional sleepers. Off2riorob (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence submitted by User:Carolmooredc

  • Spaceclerk repeatedly refused to acknowledge that I had admitted I misunderstood the purpose of the article in my first couple postings, making it necessary for me to add a disclaimer to them. He kept accusing me of wanting to change the purpose of the article, even created an obnoxious accusatory section misquoting me here.
  • Then Spaceclerk clearly violated policy in reverting this properly referenced edit, claiming I (and evidently the WP:RS who had written similar things) were “obfuscating” the issue. When I brought the issue to talk, with even more WP:RS, he was dismissive and uncooperative.
  • At his talk page I discovered the question about his account which made me suspect he was indeed one of the banned editors/sockpuppets on these issues because that type of behavior over several articles inevitably would lead to banning. At this diff Spaceclerk deleted from his talk page 2 editors’ questions about his account, and his uncivil replies, replacing them with negative comments against us. CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response by User:Spaceclerk

I am quite sure the CheckUser process will demonstrate that the charge by Off2riorob and Carolmooredc is false. (In fact, if I'm reading the text below accurately, it already has, and I thank you.) I am not User:Historicist nor any other banned or blocked user. As I have posted on my talk page, if these two users — one of them running for ARBCOM! — continue to make false accusations about me in this fashion, this will become a matter for WP:AN/I under WP:HARASS. It is ironic in the extreme to be called 'uncivil' by someone in the very process of falsely accusing me of being a sock of a banned or blocked user. I would appreciate it if these two users would quit wasting my time. Spaceclerk (talk) 17:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Historicist&oldid=399356798"