Jump to content

User talk:68.110.9.62

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheScurvyEye (talk | contribs) at 00:08, 17 February 2006 (rvv). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you want to bitch, why not join the rest of these jokers here and bring the bad news?!

Please refrain from bad-faith edits. Instead, consider adding useful information. Discuss your points of view in the talk pages. Thanks. //Big Adamsky 19:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted you to The Offspring-related articles. You need proof that they are a punk band, not a grunge or crossover thrash band. If you vandalize these articles again, I have no choice to ask a moderator to ban you. Alex 101 15:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please discuss the DAB link on this article's talk page before removing again. Thanks TigerShark 16:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit [1]. THis is a personal attack. Please read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL and change your tone accordingly. --Doc ask? 16:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove other user's warnings from this talk page, as this is also considered vandalism. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 19:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to be banned or not?

Impostor Please stop your vandalism and using profanity immediately. Calling people a "motherfucker", calling me a "little teeny bopper boy" and saying "Leave me the fuck alone" are not acceptable comments. So, do you want to be banned or not? I could get an administrator to ban you from this. Alex 101 22:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page and/or replace it with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Shanel 00:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Returning the message

Hmmmmm...., checking back, it isn't too bad, however, you do need to careful. Vandelism, which you have been warned for before isn't tolerated on wikipedia. just take more care next time. Oh and i'll retract my statement, if you like.Random articles 21:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms of sexual behavior

My removal of your totally disputed tag from Criticisms of sexual behavior was not vandalism. You failed to give any reason for its presence on Talk:Criticisms of sexual behavior. I noted that in my edit summary. You need to give reasons for adding tags like that, or they get removed. That's just the way things work. -Seth Mahoney 21:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent criticism of that page is over two weeks old. -Seth Mahoney 22:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even sure what you're referring to. Is it the section titled "Needs supporting evidence"? Because it doesn't really look like there's even any consensus as to what the problem is. What problem do you have with the article? -Seth Mahoney 22:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're not listening: What, exactly, is the problem? -Seth Mahoney 22:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So you're not willing to tell me what problems you see in the article, but you expect me to take you seriously? -Seth Mahoney 22:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You'll notice I haven't removed the tag again. All I'm asking is that you please tell me exactly what problem you have with the page, so that it can get fixed. -Seth Mahoney 22:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're obviously not serious, and are wasting everyone's time (especially mine). I'm removing the tag. If you add it again, I will request that this IP be banned. -Seth Mahoney 22:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't clear from the talk page what the problem is. I've asked you for clarification, so that the problem could be resolved. You have refused. Without your participation, there is nothing else I can do. -Seth Mahoney 22:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've requested that your IP be blocked. If you want to take that issue up, you can find my request here: [2]. If you change your mind and decide to discuss this issue, I will withdraw the request. -Seth Mahoney 22:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist from your wholesale rewrite of the List of the monarchs of the Kingdom of England article. Your actions clearly lack any consensus. --Mais oui! 23:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Mais oui! 23:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

Leaving a comment: "You want a fight?" is considered to be a personal attack. If you continue to make personal attacks you will be banned.--Mais oui! 23:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]