Talk:Citizen Erased

Songs Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Rock music Unassessed

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notable?

I'm not entirely sure this is notable. Fulfills absolutely no criteria at WP:MUSIC/SONG. I may tag it for deletion, any views?

Oooooooh, all the OoS songs are notable, and especially this one. I replaced the stupid box and the stupid "1. REDIRECT". ^^ I think I'm going to do this with all the other OoS songs (excepting singles, obviously xD) SSBMboss 00:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I love Origin of Symmetry, but I'm really not sure that any of the non-single tracks deserve articles. — mæstrosync ^{talk&contribs}, 00:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why it should be deleted, bands like Nirvana have individual song's for preety much every song they've ever written - whether they were smash hit singles like Smells like Teen Spirit or unreleased demo's from 1985 like the Fecal Matter songs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.72.182 (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think non-single songs should have articles, simply as they are not notable enough to have their own articles, unlike the songs from Dark Side of the Moon, which each have a seperate article, because the album is notable enough to have these. Origin of Symmetry was nowhere near as successful as DSotM, therefore does not need individual song articles. If you feel that individual songs need mentioning for a particular reason, feel free to mention them in the article. Keytar Shredder (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I quote "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable". It got to #122 in the UK singles chart without it actually being a single. It's a firm fan favourite, as is evidenced by a countdown done on Phoenix FM in 2008. -Frozenjakalope (talk) 03:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terribly written

"Music part"? What the hell? Very amateur... someone who knows something about music theory/terminology should rewrite the whole article. 82.33.166.72 22:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I ain't english, excuse me. I don't know how to say it differently. :( SSBMboss 00:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it as WP:OR and needing clean-up M2Ys4U ^(talk) 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Museoriginofsymemtryalbumcover.jpg

The image Image:Museoriginofsymemtryalbumcover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive metal?

Really? 80.41.130.193 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Isn't this kind of Noise Rock? 83.253.167.142 (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive rock would be a better description of the song. Keytar Shredder : Talk To Me 12:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

post-rock

aye right 86.174.200.198 (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]