User talk:68.1.186.75

I will find all the weasels, I guarantee face to face, not behind a screen! btw... delete the "affluent" on the colts neck,nj page

Do what you want, it's always there in "view history". Threatening does not help your case, btw. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense threats doesnt help your cause. Its time to grow up IP-user.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We had to report you again. This time it will not be 24 hours block. Sorry to say, hope you will be back in the future with a more mature approach to the wikipedia. Cheers. --BabbaQ (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi

help my case- like this is some kind of real source of information- as I have now learned- its just information from "faux" know it alls. You will have your work cut out for you tough guy and if you do take this info that seriously, then you have some kind of complex or you are unemployed and hoping this will be good on your resume- hahahahah

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Cheshire, Connecticut. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chzz ► 13:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vandalism

Stop doing edits like the one of the home invasion article. If you do it again I will have no other option then to report you for vandalism. And I guarantee you that I will infact report you.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you have to gain from in fact vandalizing articles? Reverting proper edits over and over again. Also accusing other users of being dictators when in fact you are the only one showing signs of a dictatorial mind?. You have to stop doing edits like this now or it will probably be the last edits from you here on Wikipedia for a long time.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cheshire, Connecticut, you may be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Cheshire, Connecticut, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hi, now that you are blocked from Wikipedia for a week, take this week and think over your actions read trough Wikipedias guidelines for editing and come back in a week and prove that you have matured and now have an understanding for how the Wikipedia works. Nonsense threats and immature comments doesnt help you in any way,shape or form. And undoing and reverting edits that are correct are just simply wrong. I sincerely hope that you will return but as a better user.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bbq

be a man and lets discuss it-maybe over the phone?

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.