Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL coaching trees

NFL coaching trees

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic case example of Original research. Ibluffsocall (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; see above. Drmies (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the same reasons as I noted for Coaching tree, or merge the two articles as one. Bearian (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to the Coaching tree article (where I gave reasons to keep that article). There is no reason for a separate article on NFL coaching trees, at least that I can see.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment as noted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coaching tree, this is definitely not original research.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete same content as Coaching tree. Jaque Hammer (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Coaching Tree as per above. So far this seems to be an NFL-specific neologism. Unless and until this trend starts appearing in college football there is no reason for a specific article on the NFL. And in any case, it's generally better to focus on building up one article, as opposed to dividing and duplicating your efforts on a number of sub-pages. -- RoninBK _{T C} 09:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]