User talk:Wifione

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mycoltbug (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 4 March 2011 (→‎Deletion review for PAGE NAME). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

CLICK HERE TO LEAVE A NEW MESSAGE
(This user operates an alternate account)

This user is a wikimediastrategy task force member
This admin has been awarded the Order of the Mop
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

Template:User wikipedia/acc pledge

This user has AWB rights. (verify)


X's RfA report for the week
Updated every half an hour only; for latest status, kindly go directly to the RFA page


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Elli 187 5 3 97 16:53, 7 June 2024 1 day, 13 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 02:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk archives for 2010
Wifione ....... Leave a message 05:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

!

You're an ass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.134.208.112 (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know... Wifione ....... Leave a message

Vaid

Hi I was just worried that the problem edits were still viewable on the talk page, I am not saying that it is Vaid but if it were then I thought that might be a problem. I leave it in your capable hands :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi Wifione! I'm not sending out thankspam to everyone, but I would like to personally thank you for all your support on my RfA and for the kind words. I'm looking forward to working with you as a fellow admin. Regards, --Kudpung (talk) 12:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It'll be a personal privilege to work with you. My best wishes for your admin term. Call me up anytime for any assistance. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support!

Hi Wifione, It looks like this is your second day in a row receiving one of these. I couldn't not thank you for your contributions to my RfA. You made a solid argument in support of my adminship that was quoted by other supporters and you also countered arguments in the "Oppose" section. Thank you for putting the time into ensuring that I would become an administrator. Happy editing, Neelix (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Peter Orullian

Just curious why it was still deleted when there was more information added for sources that are verifyible? No one came in after all the edits I made to see what was changed. Since you deleted it what is the next step to contest the deletion?--Mycoltbug (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi there. The article was deleted as there was clear consensus to delete in the AfD. The next step: Either go for a deletion review or, in case you're confident that the article will pass our notability benchmark, recreate it in your own user space and request the input of any editor/administrator before moving it to the main article space. In case you so wish, I can move the article contents (which I deleted) to your user space. Do write back for any kind of assistance. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Peter Orullian

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Peter Orullian. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mycoltbug (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]