Jump to content

User talk:Guanaco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sue me Jeff (talk | contribs) at 17:11, 1 March 2006 (Defending myself against false accusations of myself by JVM). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

See the histories of /archive and the /archive2 for old conversations. For more recent conversations, see /archive3.

your unblock bot

still doesn't work, you can't unblock like that unless the origional block was in the same form--205.188.116.11 05:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to work on blocks explicitly targetting the IPs but not on autoblocks. —Guanaco 21:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restore my page please

It seems Cyde deleted a userbox from my page and then hid the revisions from me. Just because a userbox was deleted in template space doesn't mean it can be deleted in user space. Can you please fix this for me? Link is User:God_of_War/Warboxen

LKML Vandalism

User:Aim Here is vandalizing the article again, page blanking, and removal of content. Warned already multiple times. Waya sahoni 08:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, User:waya sahoni is almost certainly a sock puppet of User:Gadugi, who is Jeffrey Vernon Merkey. Gadugi is permanently banned from wikipedia for disruptive behaviour and legal threats when editing the Merkey article. Currently waya's tactic is to try to move most of the article to LKML, despite the consensus view which is to leave the article where it is. I figure you need some background before getting involved in this can of worms. --Aim Here 12:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:waya sahoni has been warned repeatedly that he is evading his permanent block, and that any edits he makes can be reverted on sight. I and other editors of the Jeffrey Vernon Merkey are currently defending the LKML article, as well as the aforementioned article, against continued POV edits from Jeff. --MJ(☎|@|C) 16:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Being someone who was permanently blocked is not grounds for mass reversion (unless there is an actual ban in place). Waya sahoni is still welcome to contribute as long as he does so productively. I have blocked him until 05:21, 1 March 2006 for violating 3RR on LKML. —Guanaco 21:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well I certainly thought it was a full ban, so did Gadugi (talk • contribs) as well as several admins. I can't seem to find the record of the Arbcom proceedings to confirm it however. — MediaMangler 21:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In several of his edits and those of his sockpuppets, User:Gadugi referred repeatedly to his ban and made claims that the banning policy was being violated. The more I search my memory, the more I become convinced that no actual ban was ever imposed, only an indefinite block. My recollection of Arbcom instituting a ban must be mistaken, since they surely would have archived such an action and it doesn't seem to be there. It is possible that I and others became confused by Gadugi's misuse of the term. — MediaMangler 21:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The ArbCom decision was to reject Gadugi's request for arbitration, due to his litigitious nature. I have taken the liberty of creating a archive page of that decision (based on the last version before the case was removed). As for wether Jeff was banned or merely blocked; he was making legal threats against WikiMedia (and followed through on them (items #31 and on) and I certainly had every reason to assume that Jeff Merkey, the person, has been banned for those reasons. If in doubt, consult User:Fvw or User:Mindspillage on their reasons. --MJ(☎|@|C) 22:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
There seems to have been another case: "67.177.35.25 vs. Fvw, Pgk, Exabit, Kebron, Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters, ...". But the only record I can find of that one is in the contribs of 67.177.35.25 (talk • contribs). — MediaMangler 22:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That case was also rejected. I did find the last version before it was removed though. --MJ(☎|@|C) 22:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
More importantly, in the decision User:The Epopt states that Merkey is banned until all his barratrous threats are withdrawn, settled, or judged. --MJ(☎|@|C) 22:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
I created another archive page for that case. --MJ(☎|@|C) 22:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Since Merkey claims the court has already awarded him damages of $22,000,160.00[[1]], I guess that means his litigation is over and his ban as well. (Just joking.) I'm sorry you got dragged into this Guanaco. As you can see, Mr. Merkey has a long and colorful history. So much history that senile geezers like me sometimes get confused on the details. Sorry we felt compelled to scribble so much of that history onto your talk page. — MediaMangler 23:54, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to block any account that makes legal threats similar to those made by Jeff Merkey. I will also block any accounts created to stalk other users or that violate 3RR. —Guanaco 00:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good. User:Kebron, another SCOX member, posted content to that article attempting to (inaccurately) expose my identity and subject me to danger in violation of WP:NPA. In the future any mention and implied comments I see which A) Characterize me as the subject of that article or B) attempt to expose my identity, or C) referring to me by the name of the subject of that article or D) making attacks and allegations of my sexual orientation to expose me to danger or social stygmitization, and I will take such actions as an attempt to violate WP:NPA policy and subject me to ridicule, danger, and wrongful association. Waya sahoni 05:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Noone goes to the trouble of writing hundres of posts protesting that one is not such and such member or not. If someone were to suggest that I were Jeff Merkey or PJ (even), I would simply let everyone know who I was, and that would be the end of the situation. There is a time and aplace for secrecy, of course... and this is not one of them. Docrailgun 09:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jeffrey Vernon Merkey WP:NPA violation by User:Vryl SCOX Member

User is attempting to expose another use to danger, social, and /or political attacks by falsely associating them with the subject of the article and attempting to reveal them. Also is a personal attack. Blatant WP:NPA. I have reverted once. Before I revert again, can you handle this one, or should I? Thanks. They are placing the content in the tag at the top of the page. SCOX traffic at Yahoo shows they are conducting most of their talking via instant messegner and not the talk pages of this site to coordinate their stalking and attacks. Waya sahoni 06:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vryl is disregarding the discussion on this page and revert warring and vandalizing the talk page by removing project tags. I have warned him once and asked nicely once to stop -- he is ignoring the warnings. Probably SCOX role account Waya sahoni 06:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are a strange fish, Jeff. What was with this?: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey&oldid=41295696 Why isn't that vandalism? You pulled down all the embarrassing stuff about yourself, trashed the article, and put it unverified, flattering stuff. But you are not Jeff. Yeah, riiiiggght...

Vryl 07:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my page for definitve proof that Waya Sahoni is indeed Jeff Vernon Merkey. So, I am not "falsely associating" Jeff with Waya Sahoni. The term would be "correctly associating". So, what is the status of this blatant sock-puppeteering banned user? If he was banned as Gadugi, shouldn't he be banned as Waya Sahoni?

As for false allegations, Jeff, what the hell is the nonsense about Instant Messanger? Which "SCOX Traffic" shows this? Also, what the hell is a "SCOX Role Account". You keep saying that like it means something.

People interested in The SCO Group have a legitimate interest in the Jeff Merkey page on Wikipedia, as Jeff at various times inveigled himself into that dispute. They have a legitimate interest in seeing that it remains true to the facts and encyclopedic. Keeping an eye on that page cannot be equated with stalking or cyberstalking Jeff.

Vryl 11:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waya sahoni

Sorry to see User:Waya sahoni has managed to get someone blocked for stalking. I am afraid that User:Why you so hawny? is correct that User:Waya sahoni is a sockpuppet of Gadugi (talk · contribs · email), although I do not approve of the way WYSH is going about it. Perhaps his chosen nom-de-guerre is childish, but I do advise you to review Waya's contributions, compare these to Gadugi's, and draw your own conclusions. Especially because makeing baseless accusations is Gadugi's specialization.

All WYSH did was revert a known sockpuppets edits, which is something I will also do, on sight. Also note that Waya sahoni went way beyond 3RR to keep his non-consensus version of the LKML article going, and WYSH was not the only opposing editor in that revert war. --MJ(☎|@|C) 16:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I did not block this person, they did that all on their own. Why is it that Linux and SCOX folks always want to blame the world for their own actions? Linus takes IP from IBM and SCO sues Linux for theft of IP and it's SCO and Jeff Merkey's fault they stole other peoples property. Linux infringes 300+ patents and its the US Patent Office's fault for issuing software patents in the first place. Does Linus and his SCOX community own any of this? Hawny owns his own actions, as do we all. Waya sahoni 06:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and -- congrats

Since I didn't say so explicitly, on your restored mop. You should write an essay on the last 18 months... +sj + 19:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality warning

That was a stroke of genius, and it made me chuckle a little. Thanks! -Seth Mahoney 03:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also have User:Guanaco/is gay new and User:Guanaco/is gay edit for warning those people. —Guanaco 04:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I just wet myself. Thanks again - after two hours of Russian homework, I needed a good laugh. -Seth Mahoney 04:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just trying to assume good faith without using teeth unnecessarily. —Guanaco 04:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, Andrew's sexuality is a hot topic: [2] -Seth Mahoney 04:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage

Thank you!!!--SMP - talk page (en) - talk page (ca) 13:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User User:Why you so hawny? has reincarnated himself as sockpuppet User:Sue me Jeff

His new name is inappropriate. What a joke, I am still hurting from my sides laughing so hard when I saw it. He is back to his old tricks of stalking and user page vandalism and harassment. Waya sahoni 16:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What a blatant lie. My account is the first and only I have at WP. Its name may be deemed offensive only *if* Waya sahoni is actually the banned gadugi whose real name is Jeffrey Vernon Merkey. Otherwise, he should not worry about any Jeff, should he?
And if Waya sahoni and gadugi are one person, User:Waya sahoni should be banned per the peemament bar of User:Gadugi.
Please take note that Waya sahoni has continues a history of vandalization of Jeffrey Vernon Merkey page started by gadugi.
If and when Waya sahoni is banned my nym de guerre becomes unnecessary and will be discontinued whether you ban it or not. I do not want to create an account which may help Jeff Merkey learn my true identity because of his history of litigation against anyone who disagrees with him. Sue me Jeff 17:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Guanaco&oldid=41772067"