I admit that I haven't created a great number of articles in my year and a half at Wikipedia – I've only started 20 – but many I consider to be of a somewhat high importance because of their focus on state government and elections. Some articles I've created are stubs, but others are significantly longer and remain of my general composition, including "Elections in Connecticut," "Connecticut elections, 2010," and "Connecticut Probate Courts." (See list of all 20 here.) No article, redirect, template, image, etc. that I started has ever been subject to any XfD discussions; the most significant actions any of them have ever faced are a few minor page moves ("List of Republican responses to the State of the Union address" to just "Republican response to the State of the Union address," for example). In addition to seeking this request today, I was successful in seeking Reviewer rights in June 2010. While I will continue to create additional articles whether I am granted this right or not, today I hope to be judged by quality over quantity. Regardless, I thank you for your consideration. Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Iv started more than 60 articles I reckon. Iv had to issues with afds for my new articles in the past (which has been partly solved my my now using the underconstruction template). I just realised that there is something called Autopatrolled rights - it would be good to have the same. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते16:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've created 40 articles by my own and all of them are sufficiently well written and trusted on Wikipedia in terms of all aspects of BLP, Notability or Verifiability; i understand all of these conditions very well. So i'd like to have an autopatroller right; i already have reviewer, rollbacker rights also. Bill william comptonTalk02:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't created many articles but those I have created have been of an acceptable standard. As well, the average standard of my edits suggests that any future pages I create (and there are many redlinks I'd like to bluelink) will not be worth bothering NPPs over. Thank you. LordVetinari (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Granted, but in my defense, that was one of my first attempts at creating a disambig. And doesn't my edit history demonstrate constant improvement in my knowledge of MoS and WP processes? Perhaps I can counter with this? Although, I didn't create the page, I still think it shows my standard of editing. As well, as a NPP, I often try to clean up an article in an attempt to determine whether anything can be saved, even if I suspect there's nothing to save (e.g. here). By the way, thanks for letting me know about the disambig tag. I haven't done much DABing and didn't realise it needed to be added. Regards, -- LordVetinari (talk) 21:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done & good editing... Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)