User talk:24.0.91.81

No, it's not all POV. Everything must be reported NPOV, regardless of general sentiment. Superm401 | Talk 04:57, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

And frankly, the Canada article is long enough now without adding details about one war. The details belong at that "excellent article" War of 1812. My dispute with your wording is "illegal impressment" and "harassment" - that's clearly a point of view that's worth going to war over :-). The way the Canada article now reads summarises the reason for war quite precisely. The US wanted to control UK's access to the Atlantic and North America to stop impressments and military skirmishes. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:18, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then why doesn't it say that? Got an answer for that Schmuppy?

It does say that: The War of 1812 began when the U.S. attacked British forces in Canada in an attempt to reduce their control of North America and the Atlantic. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:26, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing anonymously. You can continue to do so. You are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, but not doing so will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.0.91.81). There are many benefits for logging in to Wikipedia.

Please note these points:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

from Wikipedian: DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:14, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil and assume good faith

Your edit summary here is inappropriate. We can have differences of opinion but, in the end, we are all just trying to make a better encyclopedia. Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia:Assume good faith DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:24, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Civil is all you've seen so far.

User accounts

Please do not use sock puppet accounts. Pick an account and stick with it. User:LesbianLatke, user:155.84.57.253, user:CaptainJackWill, user:WehrWolf, whichever. If you keep using many accounts we're gonna start blocking some of them. -Willmcw 05:43, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Block

OK Zoe, you blocked me. For what? Vandalism? Hardly. Holding Sheehan to task for being antisemitic is Vandalism? Do you also have an antisemitic agenda?

Cold War

Please state your dispute on Talk:Cold War before reinserting the dispute tag. What exactly about the neutrality and factual accuracy of the article are you disputing? 172 | Talk 00:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me for repairing tags that an administrator put in the article in the first place, and a determined vandal kept removing. It wasn't even my argument. 24.0.91.81 01:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Please don't change from American spelling to British spelling, or vice versa. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

???? Whack Job? 24.0.91.81 23:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neofascism and religion

You restored quotes to the Neofascism and religionarticle that were moved as a result of a vote to keep the page Islamofascism (term). This vote reflected a consensus of many editors, I voted on the losing side, but moved the quotes to show good faith editing. These quotes now exist on both pages. Please consider going back and reversing what you did.--Cberlet 12:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions are considered non-notable and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Roy Boy ⁸⁰⁰ 05:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Registered account

Why can't you use a registered account? --Viriditas 02:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can and I usually do, but I would like the reputation of this IP to be cleared. Is that too much to ask? 24.0.91.81 02:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, stop deleting the comments on this page. --Viriditas 02:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Very well, then what? 24.0.91.81 02:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once we have an accurate record of discussion, we can go from there. I have no objections to changing the template if you are not Shran. Are you Shran? --Viriditas 02:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not. I have edited some of the same sci-fi articles, but there is no connection. I am a sci-fi geek. 24.0.91.81 02:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, what about User:LesbianLatke, user:155.84.57.253, user:CaptainJackWill, user:WehrWolf? Have you used those accounts? --Viriditas 02:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. 24.0.91.81 02:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone used the account 24.0.91.81 other than you? Is this a static IP? In other words, if you review the contribution history for this account, do all of the edits belong to you? --Viriditas 02:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible that a few edits may have been made by my brother in law, on one of his frequent visits, but I'm not sure. 24.0.91.81 02:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to logoff, but I would like it if you contact User:Willmcw and leave him a message on his talk page notifying him of your concerns. In the meantime, I will request unprotection so that you can remove the template. --Viriditas 02:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

You are invited to discuss the structure of this article on its talk page. What do you think needs to be done during the AIDcollaboration?--Fenice 08:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Festivus

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim Apple 06:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Negro please. What a douche. 24.0.91.81 02:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

100 People Who Are Screwing Up America

Please stop trying to insert random comments about Robert Byrd into this article. I have no objection to him being mentioned, but just throwing comments in there at random doesn't work. The list is already printed at the bottom. The only reason some names are mentioned again above that is because they are relevant to the criticism/praise of the book. Byrd is not. Hopefully that explains why we've been removing your comments. If you can figure out a way to insert your comment so that it is relevant and notable to the article, please do so. Otherwise, let's just agree to leave it out. Thanks - Maximusveritas 08:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of political epithets

You are advised to stop trying to insert your own POV into a number of entries in that article. If you continue to do so without explanation, you will continue to be reverted. -- Nikodemos 03:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

With few exceptions, users should make all their contributions from a single account. Wikipedia:Sock puppetry

Please do not use more than one account to edit any single article. If you continue I will block all of your sock accounts. -Will Beback 19:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have only one account. However, from the best I can tell, others do share my IP from time to time, because it's dynamic. Also, I use a privacy software, so my IP does not always show up precisely right away. The privacy filter cannot be disabled - it's company policy - sorry. The best place to talk to me at any time isn on the talk page of the article under discussion. Leave a diff link and if it was my edit, I'll reply. Also, Stbalbach is monitoring my edits. He must have nothing better to do. Also, when I leave a comment for him on his talk page, he deletes it. 192.168.185.76 01:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

192.168.0.0/16 is a non-routeable address, it's a bogus IP. Your manually changing the IP.[1] No one shares the accounts, look at the edit record for the multitude of accounts you post under listed here: Anon Texan, it speaks for its self. -- Stbalbach 02:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. The IP variance is caused by company installed privacy software. And I have checked the edit historys and I do see that not all the edits were made by me. And frankly, it's none of your business anyway. Please stop bugging me. 67.15.76.185 02:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you people, and why are you posting to my talk page? I don't know anything about any of you. 24.0.91.81 03:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.